Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark J. Cianchetti

dblp:39/5754 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 61% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 30% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
optical network-on-chip
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing
optical routing
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Electronic design automation › physical design
routing
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor
0.012009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A low-latency, high-throughput on-chip optical router architecture for future chip multiprocessors
abstract
Tens and eventually hundreds of processing cores are projected to be integrated onto future microprocessors, making the global interconnect a key component to achieving scalable chip performance within a given power envelope. While CMOS-compatible nanophotonics has emerged as a leading candidate for replacing global wires beyond the 16nm timeframe, on-chip optical interconnect architectures are typically limited in scalability or are dependent on comparatively slow electrical control networks. In this article, we present a hybrid electrical/optical router for future large scale, cache coherent multicore microprocessors. The heart of the router is a low-latency optical crossbar that uses predecoded source routing and switch state preconfiguration to transmit cache-line-sized packets several hops in a single clock cycle under contentionless conditions. Overall, our optical router achieves 2X better network performance than a state-of-the-art electrical baseline in a mesh topology while consuming 30% less network power.
Mark J. Cianchetti, David H. Albonesi
ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.1
2009 Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network
abstract
Tens and eventually hundreds of processing cores are projected to be integrated onto future microprocessors, making the global interconnect a key component to achieving scalable chip performance within a given power envelope. While CMOS-compatible nanophotonics has emerged as a leading candidate for replacing global wires beyond the 22nm timeframe, on-chip optical interconnect architectures proposed thus far are either limited in scalability or are dependent on comparatively slow electrical control networks.
Mark J. Cianchetti, Joseph C. Kerekes, David H. Albonesi
ISCA1
2008 Shared reconfigurable architectures for CMPS
abstract
This paper investigates reconfigurable architectures suitable for chip multiprocessors (CMPs). Prior research has established that augmenting a conventional processor with reconfigurable logic can dramatically improve the performance of certain application classes, but this comes at non-trivial power and area costs. Given substantial observed time and space differences in fabric usage, we propose that pools of programmable logic should be shared among multiple cores. While a common shared pool is more compact and power efficient, fabric conflicts may lead to large performance losses relative to per-core private fabrics. We identify particular characteristics of past reconfigurable fabric designs that are particularly amenable to fabric sharing. We then propose spatially and temporally shared fabrics in a CMP. The sharing policies that we devise incur negligible performance loss compared to private fabrics, while cutting the area and peak power of the fabric by 4X.
Matthew A. Watkins, Mark J. Cianchetti, David H. Albonesi
FPL2