Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lan Nie
dblp:39/6840
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 59% Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
8 papers |
Information retrieval · 59% Recommender systems · 25% Web and social media mining · 11% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Online Multi-task Learning Framework for Google Feed Ads Auction Models · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Online Multi-task Learning Framework for Google Feed Ads Auction Models · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
online multi-task learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Online Multi-task Learning Framework for Google Feed Ads Auction Models · KDD 2022 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.3 | 5 | 2008 | Winnowing wheat from the chaff: propagating trust to sift spam from the web · SIGIR 2007 Ranking by community relevance · SIGIR 2007 From Whence Does Your Authority Come? Utilizing Community Relevance in Ranking · AAAI 2007 |
Information retrieval › web search
link analysis |
0.2 | 3 | 2008 | Separate and inequal: preserving heterogeneity in topical authority flows · SIGIR 2008 Topical link analysis for web search · SIGIR 2006 From Whence Does Your Authority Come? Utilizing Community Relevance in Ranking · AAAI 2007 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ad click prediction: a view from the trenches · KDD 2013 |
Recommender systems
click-through rate prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Ad click prediction: a view from the trenches · KDD 2013 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | A cautious surfer for PageRank · WWW 2007 Separate and inequal: preserving heterogeneity in topical authority flows · SIGIR 2008 |
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
authority ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | From Whence Does Your Authority Come? Utilizing Community Relevance in Ranking · AAAI 2007 |
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
pagerank |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A cautious surfer for PageRank · WWW 2007 |
Web and social media mining › trust assessment
trust-based ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A cautious surfer for PageRank · WWW 2007 |
Data mining › network analysis
trust propagation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Winnowing wheat from the chaff: propagating trust to sift spam from the web · SIGIR 2007 |
Web and social media mining
web spam detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Winnowing wheat from the chaff: propagating trust to sift spam from the web · SIGIR 2007 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Ad click prediction: a view from the trenches · KDD 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-stage training · 1.1auto-parameter learning · 1.1per-coordinate learning rates · 0.3FTRL-proximal · 0.3pagerank · 0.2random walk · 0.1trust propagation · 0.1trustrank · 0.1link analysis · 0.1HITS · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | An Online Multi-task Learning Framework for Google Feed Ads Auction ModelsabstractIn this paper, we introduce a large scale online multi-task deep learning framework for modeling multiple feed ads auction prediction tasks on an industry-scale feed ads recommendation platform. Multiple prediction tasks are combined into one single model which is continuously trained on real time new ads data. Multi-tasking ads auction models in real-time faces many real-world challenges. For example, each task may be trained on different set of training data; the labels of different tasks may have different arrival time due to label delay; different tasks will interact with each other; combining the losses of each task is non-trivial. We tackle these challenges using practical and novel techniques such as multi-stage training for handling label delay, Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts (MMoE) to optimize model interaction and an auto-parameter learning algorithm to optimize the loss weights of different tasks. We demonstrate that our proposed techniques can lead to quality improvements and substantial resource saving compared to modeling each single task independently. Mustafa Ispir, Zhiyuan Cheng 0002, Lan Nie, Kishor Barman |
KDD | 7 |
| 2013 | Ad click prediction: a view from the trenchesabstractPredicting ad click-through rates (CTR) is a massive-scale learning problem that is central to the multi-billion dollar online advertising industry. We present a selection of case studies and topics drawn from recent experiments in the setting of a deployed CTR prediction system. These include improvements in the context of traditional supervised learning based on an FTRL-Proximal online learning algorithm (which has excellent sparsity and convergence properties) and the use of per-coordinate learning rates. H. Brendan McMahan, Gary Holt, D. Sculley, Dietmar Ebner, Julian Grady, Lan Nie, Todd Phillips, Eugene Davydov, Daniel Golovin, Sharat Chikkerur, Martin Wattenberg, Arnar Mar Hrafnkelsson, Tom Boulos, Jeremy Kubica |
KDD | 7 |
| 2010 | Resolving Surface Forms to Wikipedia Topics
Yiping Zhou, Lan Nie, Omid Rouhani-Kalleh, Flavian Vasile, Scott Gaffney |
COLING | 2 |
| 2008 | Separate and inequal: preserving heterogeneity in topical authority flowsabstractWeb pages, like people, are often known by others in a variety of contexts. When those contexts are sufficiently distinct, a page's importance may be better represented by multiple domains of authority, rather than by one that indiscriminately mixes reputations. In this work we determine domains of authority by examining the contexts in which a page is cited. However, we find that it is not enough to determine separate domains of authority; our model additionally determines the local flow of authority based upon the relative similarity of the source and target authority domains. In this way, we differentiate both incoming and outgoing hyperlinks by topicality and importance rather than treating them indiscriminately. We find that this approach compares favorably to other topical ranking methods on two real-world datasets and produces an approximately 10% improvement in precision and quality of the top ten results over PageRank. Lan Nie, Brian D. Davison 0001 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2007 | From Whence Does Your Authority Come? Utilizing Community Relevance in Ranking
Lan Nie, Brian D. Davison 0001, Baoning Wu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2007 | Ranking by community relevanceabstractA web page may be relevant to multiple topics; even when nominally on a single topic, the page may attract attention (and thus links) from multiple communities. Instead of indiscriminately summing the authority provided by all pages, we decompose a web page into separate subnodes with respect to each community pointing to it. By considering the relevance of these communities, we are able to better model the query-specific reputation for each potential result. We apply a total of 125 queries to the TREC .GOV dataset to demonstrate how the use of community relevance can improve ranking performance. Lan Nie, Brian D. Davison 0001, Baoning Wu |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2007 | Winnowing wheat from the chaff: propagating trust to sift spam from the webabstractThe Web today includes many pages intended to deceive search engines, and attain an unwarranted result ranking. Since the links among web pages are used to calculate authority, ranking systems would benefit from knowing which pages contain content to be trusted and which do not. We propose and compare various trust propagation methods to estimate the trustworthiness of each page. We find that a non-trust-preserving propagation method is able to achieve close to a fifty percent improvement over TrustRank in separating spam from non-spam pages. Lan Nie, Baoning Wu, Brian D. Davison 0001 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2007 | A cautious surfer for PageRankabstractThis work proposes a novel cautious surfer to incorporate trust into the process of calculating authority for web pages. We evaluate a total of sixty queries over two large, real-world datasets to demonstrate that incorporating trust can improve PageRank's performance. Lan Nie, Baoning Wu, Brian D. Davison 0001 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2006 | Topical link analysis for web searchabstractTraditional web link-based ranking schemes use a single score to measure a page's authority without concern of the community from which that authority is derived. As a result, a resource that is highly popular for one topic may dominate the results of another topic in which it is less authoritative. To address this problem, we suggest calculating a score vector for each page to distinguish the contribution from different topics, using a random walk model that probabilistically combines page topic distribution and link structure. We show how to incorporate the topical model within both PageRank and HITS without affecting the overall property and still render insight into topic-level transition. Experiments on multiple datasets indicate that our technique outperforms other ranking approaches that incorporate textual analysis. Lan Nie, Brian D. Davison 0001, Xiaoguang Qi |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2005 | Unsupervised style classification of document page imagesabstractStyle classification of document page images is crucial for logical structure analysis of heterogeneous collections of documents. Both layout and contextual features contain significant information about document styles. Most existing methods are supervised methods in which specific document models or classifiers are learned from a training set of document page images with known class labels. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised classification method that involves no training or manual selection of algorithm parameters. In particular, we first represent each document page as an ordered labeled X-Y tree. A tree matching algorithm is then used to compute style dissimilarity between two document pages. We propose a set of tree edit cost functions based on Karl Pearson distance between two multivariate feature observations, which is robust to the over-segmentation problem and zone length variations of same logical entities. Finally, the K-medoids algorithm is used to find an optimal grouping of the trees into K clusters, each of which corresponds to a distinct document style. We evaluate our algorithm on test datasets with different cluster sizes and degrees of style similarity. Experimental results show our algorithm achieved an average classification accuracy of 95.69% over six datasets consisting of 150 pages of 11 different styles. Song Mao, Lan Nie, George R. Thoma |
ICIP (2) | 2 |