Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sonia H. Shah
dblp:39/7236
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0001-5860-4526ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | rHVDM: an R package to predict the activity and targets of a transcription factor · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › transcription factor analysis
transcription factor target prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | rHVDM: an R package to predict the activity and targets of a transcription factor · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time course gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | rHVDM: an R package to predict the activity and targets of a transcription factor · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization · 0.1dynamic mechanistic modeling · 0.1differential equation integration · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | rHVDM: an R package to predict the activity and targets of a transcription factorabstractSUMMARY: Highly parallel genomic platforms like microarrays often present researchers with long lists of differentially expressed genes but contain little or no information on how these genes are regulated. rHVDM is a novel R package which uses gene expression time course data to predict the activity and targets of a transcription factor. In the first step, rHVDM uses a small number of known targets to derive the activity profile of a given transcription factor. Then, in a subsequent step, this activity profile is used to predict other putative targets of that transcription factor. A dynamic and mechanistic model of gene expression is at the heart of the technique. Measurement error is taken into account during the process, which allows an objective assessment of the robustness of fit and, therefore, the quality of the predictions. The package relies on efficient algorithms and vectorization to accomplish potentially time consuming tasks including optimization and differential equation integration. We demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of rHVDM by examining the activity of the tumour-suppressing transcription factor, p53. AVAILABILITY: The version of the package presented here (1.8.1) is freely available from the Bioconductor Web site (http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.3/bioc/html/rHVDM.html). Martino Barenco, E. Papouli, Sonia H. Shah, Daniel Brewer, Crispin J. Miller, Michael Hubank |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Identifying differential exon splicing using linear models and correlation coefficientsabstractBACKGROUND: With the availability of the Affymetrix exon arrays a number of tools have been developed to enable the analysis. These however can be expensive or have several pre-installation requirements. This led us to develop an analysis workflow for analysing differential splicing using freely available software packages that are already being widely used for gene expression analysis. The workflow uses the packages in the standard installation of R and Bioconductor (BiocLite) to identify differential splicing. We use the splice index method with the LIMMA framework. The main drawback with this approach is that it relies on accurate estimates of gene expression from the probe-level data. Methods such as RMA and PLIER may misestimate when a large proportion of exons are spliced. We therefore present the novel concept of a gene correlation coefficient calculated using only the probeset expression pattern within a gene. We show that genes with lower correlation coefficients are likely to be differentially spliced. RESULTS: The LIMMA approach was used to identify several tissue-specific transcripts and splicing events that are supported by previous experimental studies. Filtering the data is necessary, particularly removing exons and genes that are not expressed in all samples and cross-hybridising probesets, in order to reduce the false positive rate. The LIMMA approach ranked genes containing single or few differentially spliced exons much higher than genes containing several differentially spliced exons. On the other hand we found the gene correlation coefficient approach better for identifying genes with a large number of differentially spliced exons. CONCLUSION: We show that LIMMA can be used to identify differential exon splicing from Affymetrix exon array data. Though further work would be necessary to develop the use of correlation coefficients into a complete analysis approach, the preliminary results demonstrate their usefulness for identifying differentially spliced genes. The two approaches work complementary as they can potentially identify different subsets of genes (single/few spliced exons vs. large transcript structure differences). Sonia H. Shah, Jacqueline A. Pallas |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |