Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sinan Erten

dblp:39/7968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0001-9546-2387ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
disease gene prioritization
0.112011
Disease Gene Prioritization Based on Topological Similarity in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks · RECOMB 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics › disease gene prioritization
network-based prioritization
0.112011
Disease Gene Prioritization Based on Topological Similarity in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks · RECOMB 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction network analysis
0.112011
Disease Gene Prioritization Based on Topological Similarity in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks · RECOMB 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 What Do We Learn from Network-Based Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Data?
Marzieh Ayati, Sinan Erten, Mehmet Koyutürk
EvoApplications2
2011 Disease Gene Prioritization Based on Topological Similarity in Protein-Protein Interaction Networks
Sinan Erten, Gürkan Bebek, Mehmet Koyutürk
RECOMB1
2009 Phylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networks
abstract
BACKGROUND: In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity. RESULTS: In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (i) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (ii) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (iii) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, MOPHY, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that MOPHY is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology. CONCLUSION: These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules.
Sinan Erten, Xin Li 0130, Gürkan Bebek, Jing Li 0002, Mehmet Koyutürk
BMC Bioinform.1