Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siavosh Benabbas
dblp:39/8015
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational complexity · 52% Approximation and online algorithms · 24% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 24% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013 |
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction › Max-CSP
MAX-2-SAT |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph partitioning
max-bisection |
0.4 | 2 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013 |
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
constraint satisfaction approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
verifiable computation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Verifiable Delegation of Computation over Large Datasets · CRYPTO 2011 |
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation |
0.1 | 2 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013 |
Computational complexity › hardness of approximation
unique games conjecture |
0.1 | 2 | 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semidefinite programming · 0.4rounding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max BisectionabstractRecently, Raghavendra and Tan (SODA 2012) gave a 0.85-approximation algorithm for the M ax B isection problem. We improve their algorithm to a 0.8776-approximation. As M ax B isection is hard to approximate within α GW + ε ≈ 0.8786 under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), our algorithm is nearly optimal. We conjecture that M ax B isection is approximable within α GW − ε, that is, that the bisection constraint (essentially) does not make M ax C ut harder. We also obtain an optimal algorithm (assuming the UGC) for the analogous variant of M ax 2-S at . Our approximation ratio for this problem exactly matches the optimal approximation ratio for M ax 2-S at , that is, α LLZ + ε ≈ 0.9401, showing that the bisection constraint does not make M ax 2-S at harder. This improves on a 0.93-approximation for this problem from Raghavendra and Tan. Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Konstantinos Georgiou |
ACM Trans. Algorithms | 2 |
| 2013 | Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max BisectionabstractRecently Raghavendra and Tan (SODA 2012) gave a 0.85-approximation algorithm for the Max Bisection problem. We improve their algorithm to a 0.8776-approximation. As Max Bisection is hard to approximate within $\alpha_{GW} + \epsilon \approx 0.8786$ under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), our algorithm is nearly optimal. We conjecture that Max Bisection is approximable within $\alpha_{GW}-\epsilon$, i.e., the bisection constraint (essentially) does not make Max Cut harder.
We also obtain an optimal algorithm (assuming the UGC) for the analogous variant of Max 2-Sat. Our approximation ratio for this problem exactly matches the optimal approximation ratio for Max 2-Sat, i.e., $\alpha_{LLZ} + \epsilon \approx 0.9401$, showing that the bisection constraint does not make Max 2-Sat harder. This improves on a 0.93-approximation for this problem due to Raghavendra and Tan. Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Konstantinos Georgiou |
SODA | 2 |
| 2011 | Verifiable Delegation of Computation over Large Datasets
Siavosh Benabbas, Rosario Gennaro, Yevgeniy Vahlis |
CRYPTO | 1 |
| 2011 | Tight Gaps for Vertex Cover in the Sherali-Adams SDP HierarchyabstractWe give the first tight integrality gap for Vertex Cover in the Sherali-Adams SDP system. More precisely, we show that for every \epsilon >0, the standard SDP for Vertex Cover that is strengthened with the level-6 Sherali-Adams system has integrality gap 2-\epsilon. To the best of our knowledge this is the first nontrivial tight integrality gap for the Sherali-Adams SDP hierarchy for a combinatorial problem with hard constraints. For our proof we introduce a new tool to establish Local-Global Discrepancy which uses simple facts from high-dimensional geometry. This allows us to give Sherali-Adams solutions with objective value n(1/2+o(1)) for graphs with small (2+o(1)) vector chromatic number. Since such graphs with no linear size independent sets exist, this immediately gives a tight integrality gap for the Sherali-Adams system for superconstant number of tightenings. In order to obtain a Sherali-Adams solution that also satisfies semidefinite conditions, we reduce semidefiniteness to a condition on the Taylor expansion of a reasonably simple function that we are able to establish up to constant-level SDP tightenings. We conjecture that this condition holds even for superconstant levels which would imply that in fact our solution is valid for superconstant level Sherali-Adams SDPs. Siavosh Benabbas, Siu On Chan, Konstantinos Georgiou, Avner Magen |
FSTTCS | 1 |
| 2010 | Extending SDP Integrality Gaps to Sherali-Adams with Applications to Quadratic Programming and MaxCutGain
Siavosh Benabbas, Avner Magen |
IPCO | 1 |
| 2010 | On Quadratic Threshold CSPs
Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Avner Magen |
LATIN | 2 |