Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siavosh Benabbas

dblp:39/8015 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 52% Approximation and online algorithms · 24% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 24%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.422016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction › Max-CSP
MAX-2-SAT
0.422016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph partitioning
max-bisection
0.422016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
constraint satisfaction approximation
0.212016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
verifiable computation
0.112011
Verifiable Delegation of Computation over Large Datasets · CRYPTO 2011
Computational complexity
hardness of approximation
0.122016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013
Computational complexity › hardness of approximation
unique games conjecture
0.122016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection · SODA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semidefinite programming · 0.4rounding · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection
abstract
Recently, Raghavendra and Tan (SODA 2012) gave a 0.85-approximation algorithm for the M ax B isection problem. We improve their algorithm to a 0.8776-approximation. As M ax B isection is hard to approximate within α GW + ε ≈ 0.8786 under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), our algorithm is nearly optimal. We conjecture that M ax B isection is approximable within α GW − ε, that is, that the bisection constraint (essentially) does not make M ax C ut harder. We also obtain an optimal algorithm (assuming the UGC) for the analogous variant of M ax 2-S at . Our approximation ratio for this problem exactly matches the optimal approximation ratio for M ax 2-S at , that is, α LLZ + ε ≈ 0.9401, showing that the bisection constraint does not make M ax 2-S at harder. This improves on a 0.93-approximation for this problem from Raghavendra and Tan.
Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Konstantinos Georgiou
ACM Trans. Algorithms2
2013 Better Balance by Being Biased: A 0.8776-Approximation for Max Bisection
abstract
Recently Raghavendra and Tan (SODA 2012) gave a 0.85-approximation algorithm for the Max Bisection problem. We improve their algorithm to a 0.8776-approximation. As Max Bisection is hard to approximate within $\alpha_{GW} + \epsilon \approx 0.8786$ under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), our algorithm is nearly optimal. We conjecture that Max Bisection is approximable within $\alpha_{GW}-\epsilon$, i.e., the bisection constraint (essentially) does not make Max Cut harder. We also obtain an optimal algorithm (assuming the UGC) for the analogous variant of Max 2-Sat. Our approximation ratio for this problem exactly matches the optimal approximation ratio for Max 2-Sat, i.e., $\alpha_{LLZ} + \epsilon \approx 0.9401$, showing that the bisection constraint does not make Max 2-Sat harder. This improves on a 0.93-approximation for this problem due to Raghavendra and Tan.
Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Konstantinos Georgiou
SODA2
2011 Verifiable Delegation of Computation over Large Datasets
Siavosh Benabbas, Rosario Gennaro, Yevgeniy Vahlis
CRYPTO1
2011 Tight Gaps for Vertex Cover in the Sherali-Adams SDP Hierarchy
abstract
We give the first tight integrality gap for Vertex Cover in the Sherali-Adams SDP system. More precisely, we show that for every \epsilon >0, the standard SDP for Vertex Cover that is strengthened with the level-6 Sherali-Adams system has integrality gap 2-\epsilon. To the best of our knowledge this is the first nontrivial tight integrality gap for the Sherali-Adams SDP hierarchy for a combinatorial problem with hard constraints. For our proof we introduce a new tool to establish Local-Global Discrepancy which uses simple facts from high-dimensional geometry. This allows us to give Sherali-Adams solutions with objective value n(1/2+o(1)) for graphs with small (2+o(1)) vector chromatic number. Since such graphs with no linear size independent sets exist, this immediately gives a tight integrality gap for the Sherali-Adams system for superconstant number of tightenings. In order to obtain a Sherali-Adams solution that also satisfies semidefinite conditions, we reduce semidefiniteness to a condition on the Taylor expansion of a reasonably simple function that we are able to establish up to constant-level SDP tightenings. We conjecture that this condition holds even for superconstant levels which would imply that in fact our solution is valid for superconstant level Sherali-Adams SDPs.
Siavosh Benabbas, Siu On Chan, Konstantinos Georgiou, Avner Magen
FSTTCS1
2010 Extending SDP Integrality Gaps to Sherali-Adams with Applications to Quadratic Programming and MaxCutGain
Siavosh Benabbas, Avner Magen
IPCO1
2010 On Quadratic Threshold CSPs
Per Austrin, Siavosh Benabbas, Avner Magen
LATIN2