EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Imri Shuval
dblp:390/5136
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
probing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
weight space learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep linear probe generators · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Deep Linear Probe Generators for Weight Space LearningabstractWeight space learning aims to extract information about a neural network, such as its training dataset or generalization error. Recent approaches learn directly from model weights, but this presents many challenges as weights are high-dimensional and include permutation symmetries between neurons. An alternative approach, Probing, represents a model by passing a set of learned inputs (probes) through the model, and training a predictor on top of the corresponding outputs. Although probing is typically not used as a stand alone approach, our preliminary experiment found that a vanilla probing baseline worked surprisingly well. However, we discover that current probe learning strategies are ineffective. We therefore propose Deep Linear Probe Generators (ProbeGen), a simple and effective modification to probing approaches. ProbeGen adds a shared generator module with a deep linear architecture, providing an inductive bias towards structured probes thus reducing overfitting. While simple, ProbeGen performs significantly better than the state-of-the-art and is very efficient, requiring between 30 to 1000 times fewer FLOPs than other top approaches. Jonathan Kahana, Eliahu Horwitz, Imri Shuval, Yedid Hoshen |
ICLR | 3 |