Situational visual impairments (SVIs) hinder mobile readability, causing discomfort and limiting information access. Building on prior work in adaptive typography and accessibility, this paper presents SituFont, a context-aware and human-in-the-loop adaptive typography adjustment approach that enhances smartphone mobile readability by dynamically adjusting font parameters based on real-time contextual changes. Using smartphone sensors and a human-in-the-loop approach, SituFont personalizes text presentation to accommodate personal factors (e.g., fatigue, distraction) and environmental conditions (e.g., lighting, motion, location). To inform its design, we conducted formative interviews (N=15) to identify key SVI factors and controlled experiments (N=18) to quantify their impact on optimal text parameters. A comparative user study (N=12) across eight simulated SVI scenarios demonstrated SituFont’s effectiveness in improving smartphone mobile readability in terms of improved efficiency and reduced workload compared with a non-trivial manual adjustment baseline.

The integration of LLMs into GUI agents promises to revolutionize web browsing automation, yet the practical user experience remains challenging. This paper systematically characterizes user-reported issues with GUI agents by focusing on three dimensions: phenomena, influences, and user-centric mitigation. We adopted a two-phase method combining social media analysis (N=221 posts) and semi-structured interviews (N=21). Our findings reveal a taxonomy of complaints unique to GUI agents, including deficits in grounding abstract intent into concrete interface affordances, the inability to adapt to dynamic visual states, and the execution of erroneous actions. These lead to influences distinct from text-based hallucinations, ranging from task abandonment to security risks like uncontrolled file system access. In response, users are forced to employ ad-hoc mitigation strategies, including ecological sandboxing, and cursor shadowing to correct GUI agents behaviors. We contribute: (1) a comprehensive characterization of complaints specific to GUI agents interaction, (2) an analysis of how these phenomena degrade interaction integrity, and (3) design implications for creating consequence-aware agents.