Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xingliang Hou
dblp:390/6117
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 55% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22% Graph learning · 22% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cog-RAG: Cognitive-Inspired Dual-Hypergraph with Theme Alignment Retrieval-Augmented Generation · AAAI 2026 |
Graph data management
hypergraph |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cog-RAG: Cognitive-Inspired Dual-Hypergraph with Theme Alignment Retrieval-Augmented Generation · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
hypergraph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Graphs: Can Large Language Models Comprehend Hypergraphs? · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › relational reasoning
hypergraph reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Graphs: Can Large Language Models Comprehend Hypergraphs? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Graphs: Can Large Language Models Comprehend Hypergraphs? · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Graphs: Can Large Language Models Comprehend Hypergraphs? · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
theme alignment retrieval · 2.0dual-hypergraph · 2.0prompting · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9Hyper-COT · 0.9Hyper-BAG · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cog-RAG: Cognitive-Inspired Dual-Hypergraph with Theme Alignment Retrieval-Augmented GenerationabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the response quality and domain-specific performance of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge to combat hallucinations. In recent research, graph structures have been integrated into RAG to enhance the capture of semantic relations between entities. However, it primarily focuses on low-order pairwise entity relations, limiting the high-order associations among multiple entities. Hypergraph-enhanced approaches address this limitation by modeling multi-entity interactions via hyperedges, but they are typically constrained to inter-chunk entity-level representations, overlooking the global thematic organization and alignment across chunks. Drawing inspiration from the top-down cognitive process of human reasoning, we propose a theme-aligned dual-hypergraph RAG framework (Cog-RAG) that uses a theme hypergraph to capture inter-chunk thematic structure and an entity hypergraph to model high-order semantic relations. Furthermore, we design a cognitive-inspired two-stage retrieval strategy that first activates query-relevant thematic content from the theme hypergraph, and then guides fine-grained recall and diffusion in the entity hypergraph, achieving semantic alignment and consistent generation from global themes to local details. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that Cog-RAG significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art baseline approaches. Yifan Feng 0001, Ruoxue Li, Rundong Xue, Xingliang Hou, Yue Gao 0002, Shaoyi Du |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Beyond Graphs: Can Large Language Models Comprehend Hypergraphs?abstractExisting benchmarks like NLGraph and GraphQA evaluate LLMs on graphs by focusing mainly on pairwise relationships, overlooking the high-order correlations found in real-world data. Hypergraphs, which can model complex beyond-pairwise relationships, offer a more robust framework but are still underexplored in the context of LLMs. To address this gap, we introduce LLM4Hypergraph, the first comprehensive benchmark comprising 21,500 problems across eight low-order, five high-order, and two isomorphism tasks, utilizing both synthetic and real-world hypergraphs from citation networks and protein structures. We evaluate six prominent LLMs, including GPT-4o, demonstrating our benchmark’s effectiveness in identifying model strengths and weaknesses. Our specialized prompt- ing framework incorporates seven hypergraph languages and introduces two novel techniques, Hyper-BAG and Hyper-COT, which enhance high-order reasoning and achieve an average 4% (up to 9%) performance improvement on structure classification tasks. This work establishes a foundational testbed for integrating hypergraph computational capabilities into LLMs, advancing their comprehension. Yifan Feng 0001, Chengwu Yang, Xingliang Hou, Shaoyi Du, Shihui Ying, Zongze Wu 0001, Yue Gao 0002 |
ICLR | 3 |