Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiangxuan Long 0001
dblp:390/7565-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 40% Efficient and distributed learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Linear Approximations: A Novel Pruning Approach for Attention Matrix · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Linear Approximations: A Novel Pruning Approach for Attention Matrix · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Circuit Complexity Bounds for RoPE-based Transformer Architecture · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Circuit Complexity Bounds for RoPE-based Transformer Architecture · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
weight pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Beyond Linear Approximations: A Novel Pruning Approach for Attention Matrix · ICLR 2025 |
Computational complexity
circuit complexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Circuit Complexity Bounds for RoPE-based Transformer Architecture · EMNLP 2025 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
transformer expressivity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Circuit Complexity Bounds for RoPE-based Transformer Architecture · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
circuit complexity analysis · 1.7gradient descent · 0.9attention matrix approximation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Circuit Complexity Bounds for RoPE-based Transformer ArchitectureabstractCharacterizing the expressive power of the Transformer architecture is critical to understanding its capacity limits and scaling law.Recent works provide the circuit complexity bounds to Transformer-like architecture.On the other hand, position embedding has emerged as a crucial technique in modern large language models, offering superior performance in capturing positional information, which shows great performance for the long context scenario.In this work, we take a circuit complexity perspective and rigorously analyze Transformers augmented with widely adopted positional embeddings.We prove that, under standard complexity assumptions, such models remain incapable of efficiently solving canonical tasks such as arithmetic formula evaluation and Boolean formula value computation.Our results expose a fundamental expressivity limitation that persists despite the remarkable empirical success of positionally-enhanced Transformers.Beyond tightening known complexity bounds, our findings offer new theoretical insights for designing future architectures with provably stronger reasoning and compositional capabilities. Bo Chen 0029, Xiaoyu Li 0001, Yingyu Liang, Jiangxuan Long 0001, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song 0002 |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2025 | Beyond Linear Approximations: A Novel Pruning Approach for Attention MatrixabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have shown immense potential in enhancing various aspects of our daily lives, from conversational AI to search and AI assistants. However, their growing capabilities come at the cost of extremely large model sizes, making deployment on edge devices challenging due to memory and computational constraints. This paper introduces a novel approach to LLM weight pruning that directly optimizes for approximating the attention matrix, a core component of transformer architectures. Unlike existing methods that focus on linear approximations, our approach accounts for the non-linear nature of the Softmax attention mechanism. We provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of our Gradient Descent-based optimization method to a near-optimal pruning mask solution. Our empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our non-linear pruning approach in maintaining model performance while significantly reducing computational costs, which is beyond the current state-of-the-art methods, i.e., SparseGPT and Wanda, by a large margin. This work establishes a new theoretical foundation for pruning algorithm design in LLMs, potentially paving the way for more efficient LLM inference on resource-constrained devices. Yingyu Liang, Jiangxuan Long 0001, Zhenmei Shi, Zhao Song 0002, Yufa Zhou 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Fast Second-order Method for Neural Networks under Small Treewidth SettingabstractTraining neural networks is a fundamental problem in theoretical machine learning. Second-order methods are rarely used in practice due to their high computational cost, even they converge much faster than first-order methods. The state-of-the-art result for the second-order method to train an over-parameterized neural network can run in O(log(1/ϵ)) iterations and each iteration has O(mnd + n3) running time, where n represent the number of data points, d is the dimension of the feature space of each data and m is the width of the neural network [Brand, Peng, Song and Weinstein ITCS 2021]. In this work, we further improve the convergence rate and the running time for each iteration to O(loglog(1/ϵ)) and O(mdτ2) respectively, where m = Ω(n4) and τ is the treewidth of the data matrix and usually very small. Our algorithm has a quadratic convergence rate, so it can be regarded as a truly second-order algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first to achieve a quadratic convergence rate for neural network training, with a per-iteration running time of O(mdτ2). Xiaoyu Li 0001, Jiangxuan Long 0001, Zhao Song 0002, Tianyi Zhou 0011 |
IEEE Big Data | 2 |