Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for dento-maxillofacial diagnostics and treatment planning, and comprehensive multi-structure segmentation remains time-consuming, limiting large-scale, reproducible research. In this article, we present ToothFairy2, a MICCAI 2024 challenge on multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT. The accompanying dataset comprises 530 CBCT volumes (480 public training, 50 hidden test) with expert 3D annotations of 42 classes, including maxilla, mandible, crowns, bridges, implants, inferior alveolar canals, maxillary sinuses, pharynx, and teeth labeled according to the International Tooth Numbering System (FDI). 26 international teams participated in ToothFairy2, and their methods were run and evaluated for voxel-wise multi-class segmentation using a standardized protocol. This report extends the evaluation of teeth to also investigate the current capabilities of tooth detection and FDI numbering. Furthermore, ranking stability was analyzed to assess the robustness of the final challenge outcome. Overall, challenge participants achieved consistently high performance for large, high-contrast structures such as jawbones, pharynx, and most teeth, while maxillary sinuses, dental restorations, and fine structures remain challenging due to class imbalance and metal artifacts. Analysis of tooth-related metrics further revealed that assigning correct FDI numbers was more challenging than delineating individual teeth. By releasing CBCT data, 3D annotations, baseline models, and evaluation code, ToothFairy2 establishes a long-term benchmark to drive the development of automated methods for robust, clinically meaningful multi-structure segmentation in maxillofacial CBCT.

Cone-Beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a standard imaging modality in orofacial and dental practices, providing essential 3D volumetric imaging of anatomical structures, including jawbones, teeth, sinuses, and neurovascular canals. Accurately segmenting these structures is fundamental to numerous clinical applications, such as surgical planning and implant placement. However, manual segmentation of CBCT scans is time-intensive and requires expert input, creating a demand for automated solutions through deep learning. Effective development of such algorithms relies on access to large, well-annotated datasets, yet current datasets are often privately stored or limited in scope and considered structures, especially concerning 3D annotations. This paper proposes ToothFairy2, a comprehensive, publicly accessible CBCT dataset with voxel-level 3D annotations of 42 distinct classes corresponding to maxillofacial structures. We validate the dataset by benchmarking state-of-the-art neural network models, including convolutional, transformer-based, and hybrid Mamba-Based architectures, to evaluate segmentation performance across complex anatomical regions. Our work also explores adaptations to the nnU-Net framework to optimize multi-class segmentation for maxillofacial anatomy. The proposed dataset provides a fundamental resource for advancing maxillofacial segmentation and supports future research in automated 3D image analysis in digital dentistry.

In recent years, several algorithms have been developed for the segmentation of the Inferior Alveolar Canal (IAC) in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. However, the availability of public datasets in this domain is limited, resulting in a lack of comparative evaluation studies on a common benchmark. To address this scientific gap and encourage deep learning research in the field, the ToothFairy challenge was organized within the MICCAI 2023 conference. In this context, a public dataset was released to also serve as a benchmark for future research. The dataset comprises 443 CBCT scans, with voxel-level annotations of the IAC available for 153 of them, making it the largest publicly available dataset of its kind. The participants of the challenge were tasked with developing an algorithm to accurately identify the IAC using the 2D and 3D-annotated scans. This paper presents the details of the challenge and the contributions made by the most promising methods proposed by the participants. It represents the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of IAC segmentation methods on a common benchmark dataset, providing insights into the current state-of-the-art algorithms and outlining future research directions. Furthermore, to ensure reproducibility and promote future developments, an open-source repository that collects the implementations of the best submissions was released.