Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yannis Montreuil
dblp:391/0358
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Multi-agent systems · 20% Learning paradigms · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Towards Robust Human-AI Decision-Making via Learning-to-Defer · AAAI 2026 Adversarial Robustness in Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer: Algorithms and Guarantees · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › human-agent interaction › human-AI decision making
learning to defer |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Towards Robust Human-AI Decision-Making via Learning-to-Defer · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
shared representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
extractive question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Towards Robust Human-AI Decision-Making via Learning-to-Defer · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayes consistency · 3.5surrogate loss · 1.7minimizability gap analysis · 1.7convex surrogate loss · 1.7surrogate-consistency analysis · 1.0bayes-optimal routing · 1.0adversarial attack and defense · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Towards Robust Human-AI Decision-Making via Learning-to-DeferabstractAI systems often fail on challenging or out-of-distribution inputs—a critical limitation in domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous driving. Learning to Defer (L2D) addresses this by training models not only to predict but also to decide when to defer to external experts. This thesis develops a unified and robust framework for L2D that advances its theoretical foundations, reliability, and applicability. It characterizes Bayes-optimal routing policies, establishes surrogate-consistency guarantees, and introduces a unified adversarial framework for attacking and defending L2D with Bayes-optimal robustness. It further proposes the first top-k deferral methods in both two-stage and one-stage settings. Empirical studies validate these ideas in multi-task learning and extractive question answering with large language models. Ongoing work explores token-level routing in LLMs, online adaptation with dynamic experts, and partial deferral. Yannis Montreuil |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Adversarial Robustness in Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer: Algorithms and GuaranteesabstractTwo-stage Learning-to-Defer (L2D) enables optimal task delegation by assigning each input to either a fixed main model or one of several offline experts, supporting reliable decision-making in complex, multi-agent environments. However, existing L2D frameworks assume clean inputs and are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can manipulate query allocation—causing costly misrouting or expert overload. We present the first comprehensive study of adversarial robustness in two-stage L2D systems. We introduce two novel attack strategies—untargeted and targeted—which respectively disrupt optimal allocations or force queries to specific agents. To defend against such threats, we propose SARD, a convex learning algorithm built on a family of surrogate losses that are provably Bayes-consistent and $(\mathcal{R}, \mathcal{G})$-consistent. These guarantees hold across classification, regression, and multi-task settings. Empirical results demonstrate that SARD significantly improves robustness under adversarial attacks while maintaining strong clean performance, marking a critical step toward secure and trustworthy L2D deployment. Yannis Montreuil, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang Ooi |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task LearningabstractThe Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer (L2D) framework has been extensively studied for classification and, more recently, regression tasks. However, many real-world applications require solving both tasks jointly in a multi-task setting. We introduce a novel Two-Stage L2D framework for multi-task learning that integrates classification and regression through a unified deferral mechanism. Our method leverages a two-stage surrogate loss family, which we prove to be both Bayes-consistent and $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{R})$-consistent, ensuring convergence to the Bayes-optimal rejector. We derive explicit consistency bounds tied to the cross-entropy surrogate and the $L_1$-norm of agent-specific costs, and extend minimizability gap analysis to the multi-expert two-stage regime. We also make explicit how shared representation learning—commonly used in multi-task models—affects these consistency guarantees. Experiments on object detection and electronic health record analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and highlight the limitations of existing L2D methods in multi-task scenarios. Yannis Montreuil, Yeo Shu Heng, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang Ooi |
ICML | 1 |