Jiale Amber Wang

dblp:391/0972 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 91% Software maintenance and evolution · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test coverage
code coverage
0.812024
Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites · ASE 2024
Software testing
regression testing
0.812024
Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites · ASE 2024
Software testing › regression testing
regression test selection
0.812024
Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites · ASE 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration
0.212024
Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

incremental analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 An empirical study of developers' challenges in implementing Workflows as Code: A case study on Apache Airflow
Jerin Yasmin, Jiale Amber Wang, Yuan Tian 0008, Bram Adams
J. Syst. Softw.2
2024 Efficient Incremental Code Coverage Analysis for Regression Test Suites
abstract
Code coverage analysis has been widely adopted in the continuous integration of open-source and industry software repositories to monitor the adequacy of regression test suites. However, computing code coverage can be costly, introducing significant overhead during test execution. Plus, re-collecting code coverage for the entire test suite is usually unnecessary when only a part of the coverage data is affected by code changes. While regression test selection (RTS) techniques exist to select a subset of tests whose behaviors may be affected by code changes, they are not compatible with code coverage analysis techniques---that is, simply executing RTS-selected tests leads to incorrect code coverage results.
Jiale Amber Wang, Pengyu Nie 0001
ASE1