Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aaron Alvarado Kristanto Julistiono

dblp:391/2544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
1.012026
Optimizing Attention with Mirror Descent: Generalized Max-Margin Token Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
margin-based classification
1.012026
Optimizing Attention with Mirror Descent: Generalized Max-Margin Token Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mirror descent
1.012026
Optimizing Attention with Mirror Descent: Generalized Max-Margin Token Selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mirror descent · 1.0gradient descent · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimizing Attention with Mirror Descent: Generalized Max-Margin Token Selection
abstract
Attention mechanisms have revolutionized several domains of artificial intelligence, such as natural language processing and computer vision, by enabling models to selectively focus on relevant parts of the input data. While recent work has characterized the optimization dynamics of gradient descent (GD) in attention-based models and the structural properties of its preferred solutions, less is known about more general optimization algorithms such as mirror descent (MD). In this paper, we investigate the convergence properties and implicit biases of a family of MD algorithms tailored for softmax attention mechanisms, with the potential function chosen as the $p$-th power of the $\ell_p$-norm. Specifically, we show that these algorithms converge in direction to a generalized hard-margin SVM with an $\ell_p$-norm objective when applied to a classification problem using a softmax attention model. Notably, our theoretical results reveal that the convergence rate is comparable to that of traditional GD in simpler models, despite the highly nonlinear and nonconvex nature of the present problem. Additionally, we delve into the joint optimization dynamics of the key-query matrix and the decoder, establishing conditions under which this complex joint optimization converges to their respective hard-margin SVM solutions. Lastly, our numerical experiments on real data demonstrate that MD algorithms improve generalization over standard GD and excel in optimal token selection.
Aaron Alvarado Kristanto Julistiono, D. Ataee Tarzanagh, Navid Azizan
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1