Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kai Kiat Goh

dblp:391/3262 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Time series and sequential data · 23% Language models and text generation · 7%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
causal analysis
0.912025
LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
misbehavior detection
0.912025
LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

causal scan · 0.9causal inference · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LLMScan: Causal Scan for LLM Misbehavior Detection
abstract
Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various fields, their potential to generate untruthful and harmful responses poses significant risks, particularly in critical applications. This highlights the urgent need for systematic methods to detect and prevent such misbehavior. While existing approaches target specific issues such as harmful responses, this work introduces LLMScan, an innovative LLM monitoring technique based on causality analysis, offering a comprehensive solution. LLMScan systematically monitors the inner workings of an LLM through the lens of causal inference, operating on the premise that the LLM's `brain' behaves differently when generating harmful or untruthful responses. By analyzing the causal contributions of the LLM's input tokens and transformer layers, LLMScan effectively detects misbehavior. Extensive experiments across various tasks and models reveal clear distinctions in the causal distributions between normal behavior and misbehavior, enabling the development of accurate, lightweight detectors for a variety of misbehavior detection tasks.
Mengdi Zhang 0003, Kai Kiat Goh, Peixin Zhang 0001, Jun Sun 0001, Lin Xin Rose
ICML2