Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Osane Hackel

dblp:391/3486 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation
0.912025
Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.912025
Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mini-batch estimation · 0.9debiasing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning
abstract
Quadratic approximations form a fundamental building block of machine learning methods. E.g., second-order optimizers try to find the Newton step into the minimum of a local quadratic proxy to the objective function; and the second-order approximation of a network's loss function can be used to quantify the uncertainty of its outputs via the Laplace approximation. When computations on the entire training set are intractable - typical for deep learning - the relevant quantities are computed on mini-batches. This, however, distorts and biases the shape of the associated *stochastic* quadratic approximations in an intricate way with detrimental effects on applications. In this paper, we (i) show that this bias introduces a systematic error, (ii) provide a theoretical explanation for it, (iii) explain its relevance for second-order optimization and uncertainty quantification via the Laplace approximation in deep learning, and (iv) develop and evaluate debiasing strategies.
Lukas Tatzel, Bálint Mucsányi, Osane Hackel, Philipp Hennig
ICLR3