Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Osane Hackel
dblp:391/3486
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep Learning · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mini-batch estimation · 0.9debiasing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Debiasing Mini-Batch Quadratics for Applications in Deep LearningabstractQuadratic approximations form a fundamental building block of machine learning methods. E.g., second-order optimizers try to find the Newton step into the minimum of a local quadratic proxy to the objective function; and the second-order approximation of a network's loss function can be used to quantify the uncertainty of its outputs via the Laplace approximation. When computations on the entire training set are intractable - typical for deep learning - the relevant quantities are computed on mini-batches. This, however, distorts and biases the shape of the associated *stochastic* quadratic approximations in an intricate way with detrimental effects on applications. In this paper, we (i) show that this bias introduces a systematic error, (ii) provide a theoretical explanation for it, (iii) explain its relevance for second-order optimization and uncertainty quantification via the Laplace approximation in deep learning, and (iv) develop and evaluate debiasing strategies. Lukas Tatzel, Bálint Mucsányi, Osane Hackel, Philipp Hennig |
ICLR | 3 |