EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gaspard Oliviers
dblp:391/4247
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-6752-8296ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
predictive coding networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › machine learning benchmarking
deep learning benchmarks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
predictive coding · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made SimpleabstractIn this work, we tackle the problems of efficiency and scalability for predictive coding networks (PCNs) in machine learning. To do so, we propose a library that focuses on performance and simplicity, and use it to implement a large set of standard benchmarks for the community to use for their experiments. As most works in the field propose their own tasks and architectures, do not compare one against each other, and focus on small-scale tasks, a simple and fast open-source library, and a comprehensive set of benchmarks, would address all of these concerns. Then, we perform extensive tests on such benchmarks using both existing algorithms for PCNs, as well as adaptations of other methods popular in the bio-plausible deep learning community. All of this has allowed us to (i) test architectures much larger than commonly used in the literature, on more complex datasets; (ii) reach new state-of-the-art results in all of the tasks and dataset provided; (iii) clearly highlight what the current limitations of PCNs are, allowing us to state important future research directions. With the hope of galvanizing community efforts towards one of the main open problems in the field, scalability, we will release the code, tests, and benchmarks. Luca Pinchetti, Chang Qi, Oleh Lokshyn, Cornelius Emde, Amine M'Charrak, Mufeng Tang, Simon Frieder, Bayar Menzat, Gaspard Oliviers, Rafal Bogacz, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Tommaso Salvatori |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2024 | Learning probability distributions of sensory inputs with Monte Carlo predictive codingabstractIt has been suggested that the brain employs probabilistic generative models to optimally interpret sensory information. This hypothesis has been formalised in distinct frameworks, focusing on explaining separate phenomena. On one hand, classic predictive coding theory proposed how the probabilistic models can be learned by networks of neurons employing local synaptic plasticity. On the other hand, neural sampling theories have demonstrated how stochastic dynamics enable neural circuits to represent the posterior distributions of latent states of the environment. These frameworks were brought together by variational filtering that introduced neural sampling to predictive coding. Here, we consider a variant of variational filtering for static inputs, to which we refer as Monte Carlo predictive coding (MCPC). We demonstrate that the integration of predictive coding with neural sampling results in a neural network that learns precise generative models using local computation and plasticity. The neural dynamics of MCPC infer the posterior distributions of the latent states in the presence of sensory inputs, and can generate likely inputs in their absence. Furthermore, MCPC captures the experimental observations on the variability of neural activity during perceptual tasks. By combining predictive coding and neural sampling, MCPC can account for both sets of neural data that previously had been explained by these individual frameworks. Gaspard Oliviers, Rafal Bogacz, Alexander Meulemans |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |