Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antoni Puch

dblp:391/7059 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6728-1085ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 39% Automated reasoning and model checking · 30% Computational complexity · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
complexity classes
1.012026
Reachability in VASS Extended with Integer Counters · LICS 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability
1.012026
Reachability in VASS Extended with Integer Counters · LICS 2026
Automata and formal languages › petri nets
vector addition systems
1.012026
Reachability in VASS Extended with Integer Counters · LICS 2026
Automata and formal languages
counter machines
0.312026
Reachability in VASS Extended with Integer Counters · LICS 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

KLMST algorithm · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reachability in VASS Extended with Integer Counters
abstract
We consider a variant of VASS extended with integer counters, denoted VASS+ℤ. These are automata equipped with ℕ- and ℤ-counters; the ℕ-counters are required to remain nonnegative and the ℤ-counters do not have this restriction. We study the complexity of the reachability problem for VASS+ℤ when the number of ℕ-counters is fixed. We show that reachability is NP-complete in 1-VASS+ℤ (i.e. when there is only one ℕ-counter) regardless of unary or binary encoding. For d ≥ 2, using a KLMST-based algorithm, we prove that reachability in d-VASS+ℤ lies in the complexity class ℱ_{d+2}. Our upper bound improves on the naively obtained Ackermannian complexity by simulating the ℤ-counters with ℕ-counters. To complement our upper bounds, we show that extending VASS with integer counters significantly lowers the number of ℕ-counters needed to exhibit hardness. We prove that reachability in unary 2-VASS+ℤ is PSpace-hard; without ℤ-counters this lower bound is only known in dimension 5. We also prove that reachability in unary 3-VASS+ℤ is Tower-hard. Without ℤ-counters, reachability in 3-VASS has elementary complexity and Tower-hardness is only known in dimension 8.
Clotilde Bizière, Wojciech Czerwinski, Roland Guttenberg, Jérôme Leroux, Vincent Michielini, Lukasz Orlikowski, Antoni Puch, Henry Sinclair-Banks
LICS7
2026 Pumping-Like Results for Copyless Cost Register Automata and Polynomially Ambiguous Weighted Automata
abstract
In this work we consider two rich subclasses of weighted automata over fields: polynomially ambiguous weighted automata and copyless cost register automata. Primarily we are interested in understanding their expressiveness power. Over the field of rationals and $1$-letter alphabets, it is known that the two classes coincide; they are equivalent to linear recurrence sequences (LRS) whose exponential bases are roots of rationals. We develop a tool we call Pumping Sequence Families, which, by exploiting the simple single-letter behaviour of the models, yields two pumping-like results over arbitrary fields with unrestricted alphabets, one for each class. As a corollary of these results, we present examples proving that the two classes become incomparable over the field of rationals with unrestricted alphabets. We complement the results by analysing the zeroness and equivalence problems. For weighted automata (even unrestricted) these problems are well understood: there are polynomial time, and even NC$^2$ algorithms. For copyless cost register automata we show that the two problems are \textsc{PSpace}-complete, where the difficulty is to show the lower bound.
Filip Mazowiecki, Antoni Puch, Daniel Smertnig
STACS2