EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yeo Shu Heng
dblp:391/7630
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
shared representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate loss · 1.7minimizability gap analysis · 1.7bayes consistency · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task LearningabstractThe Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer (L2D) framework has been extensively studied for classification and, more recently, regression tasks. However, many real-world applications require solving both tasks jointly in a multi-task setting. We introduce a novel Two-Stage L2D framework for multi-task learning that integrates classification and regression through a unified deferral mechanism. Our method leverages a two-stage surrogate loss family, which we prove to be both Bayes-consistent and $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{R})$-consistent, ensuring convergence to the Bayes-optimal rejector. We derive explicit consistency bounds tied to the cross-entropy surrogate and the $L_1$-norm of agent-specific costs, and extend minimizability gap analysis to the multi-expert two-stage regime. We also make explicit how shared representation learning—commonly used in multi-task models—affects these consistency guarantees. Experiments on object detection and electronic health record analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and highlight the limitations of existing L2D methods in multi-task scenarios. Yannis Montreuil, Yeo Shu Heng, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang Ooi |
ICML | 2 |