Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Howell Xia
dblp:392/3065
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-2345-8354ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
vulnerability knowledge graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Poster: Analyzing and Correcting Inaccurate CVE-CWE Mappings in the National Vulnerability Database · CCS 2024 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability management |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Poster: Analyzing and Correcting Inaccurate CVE-CWE Mappings in the National Vulnerability Database · CCS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
longitudinal study · 1.5knowledge graph · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fixing Invalid CVE-CWE Mappings in Threat DatabasesabstractAccurate root cause analysis plays a key role for developing mitigation strategies and understanding attack paths. Many security analysis tools rely on threat databases to accurately report information related to vulnerabilities, such as root cause weaknesses or affected platforms. However, these databases are not entirely correct, with many instances of missing or erroneous information linked to vulnerabilities. This paper presents a method for automated correction of invalid Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) mappings of Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE) entries in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), which can also be applied to other threat databases. We systematically investigate the prevalence of incorrect or missing root-cause mappings, revealing that more than half of CVEs are linked to invalid or insufficiently detailed CWEs, particularly those categorized as Prohibited or Discouraged. Through a longitudinal analysis of the NVD, we detect trends in manual updates to CVE-CWE mappings and show how these can inform predictions for future corrections. We develop and present FixV2W, an automated correction method that uses a Knowledge Graph embedding model to predict and rank best-fitting CWE matches for correcting previously invalid CVE-CWE mappings. We evaluate FixV2w using invalid mappings that were subsequently corrected by the NVD. Notably, focusing on the top-10 ranked answers for correcting prohibited mappings, we show that FixV2W finds the correct CWE in 65% of the cases, and a candidate within the same branch as the correct CWE in 93% of the cases. Moreover, most of the correct mappings appear at the first or second ranks. Sevval Simsek, Howell Xia, Jonah Gluck, David Sastre Medina, David Starobinski |
COMPSAC | 2 |
| 2024 | Poster: Analyzing and Correcting Inaccurate CVE-CWE Mappings in the National Vulnerability DatabaseabstractWe conduct a longitudinal study of the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), focusing on the mappings between vulnerabilities (CVEs) and weaknesses (CWEs).Surprisingly, the study reveals that a significant portion of CVEs, fluctuating between 15% and 30% over the years, lack proper CWE mapping, and that almost 40% of the updates are non-informative.We introduce a methodology, based on knowledge graphs, for automating root cause weakness mapping for CVEs and for fixing existing inaccurate mappings.We showcase promising preliminary results toward this end. Sevval Simsek, Zhenpeng Shi, Howell Xia, David Sastre Medina, David Starobinski |
CCS | 3 |