Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sixiang Ye
dblp:392/4196
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-1322-5328ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt Alchemy: Automatic Prompt Refinement for Enhancing Code Generation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering › prompt optimization
automatic prompt optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt Alchemy: Automatic Prompt Refinement for Enhancing Code Generation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Prompt Alchemy: Automatic Prompt Refinement for Enhancing Code Generation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-agent system · 1.7large language model · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Prompt Alchemy: Automatic Prompt Refinement for Enhancing Code GenerationabstractCode generation has gained increasing attention as a task to automate software development by transforming high-level descriptions into executable code. While large language models (LLMs) are effective in generating code, their performance heavily relies on the quality of input prompts. Current prompt engineering methods involve manual effort in designing prompts, which can be time-consuming and yield inconsistent results, potentially constraining the efficacy of LLMs in practical applications. This paper introduces Prochemy, a novel approach for automatically refining prompts iteratively to enhance code generation. Prochemy addresses the limitations of manual prompt engineering by automating the optimization process, ensuring prompt consistency during inference, and aligning with multi-agent systems. It iteratively refines prompts based on model performance, using an optimized final prompt to improve consistency and reliability across tasks. We evaluate Prochemy on both natural language-based code generation and code translation tasks using three series of LLMs. Results show that when combining Prochemy with existing approaches, it outperforms baseline prompting methods. It achieves improvements of 5.0% (GPT-3.5-Turbo) and 1.9% (GPT-4o) over zero-shot baselines on HumanEval. For the state-of-the-art LDB, Prochemy + LDB outperforms standalone methods by 1.2–1.8%. For code translation, Prochemy elevates GPT-4o’s performance on Java-to-Python (AVATAR) from 74.5 to 84.1 (+12.9%) and Python-to-Java from 66.8 to 78.2 (+17.1%). Furthermore, considering that the o1-mini model integrates prompt engineering techniques, Prochemy can continue to show good performance among it, further validating its effectiveness in code generation and translation tasks. Additionally, Prochemy is designed to be plug-and-play, optimizing prompts with minimal human intervention and seamlessly bridging the gap between simple prompts and complex frameworks. Sixiang Ye, Zeyu Sun 0004, Guoqing Wang 0004, Qingyuan Liang, Zheng Li 0002, Yong Liu 0030 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |