Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikita Lyubaykin

dblp:392/4420 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 64% Question answering and dialogue systems · 14% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
latent action learning
1.922026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026
Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
1.012026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › robust question answering
distractor robustness
0.912025
Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
in-context reinforcement learning
0.912025
Vintix: Action Model via In-Context Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › sequential latent variable model
latent action models
0.912025
Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
object-centric representation learning
0.312026
Object-Centric Latent Action Learning · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised object-centric pretraining · 1.0latent action policy optimization · 1.0linear probing · 0.9latent action policies · 0.9expert distillation · 0.9algorithm distillation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Object-Centric Latent Action Learning
abstract
Leveraging vast amounts of unlabeled internet video data for embodied AI is currently bottlenecked by the lack of action labels and the presence of action-correlated visual distractors. Although recent latent action policy optimization (LAPO) has shown promise in inferring proxy action labels from visual observations, its performance degrades significantly when distractors are present. To address this limitation, we propose a novel object-centric latent action learning framework that centers on objects rather than pixels. We leverage self-supervised object-centric pretraining to disentangle the movement of the agent and distracting background dynamics. This allows LAPO to focus on task-relevant interactions, resulting in more robust proxy-action labels, enabling better imitation learning and efficient adaptation of the agent with just a few action-labeled trajectories. We evaluated our method in eight visually complex tasks across the Distracting Control Suite (DCS) and Distracting MetaWorld (DMW). Our results show that object-centric pretraining mitigates the negative effects of distractors by 50%, as measured by downstream task performance: average return (DCS) and success rate (DMW).
Albina Klepach, Alexander Nikulin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Alexander Derevyagin, Andrei Polubarov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Igor Kiselev, Vladislav Kurenkov
AAAI7
2025 Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors
abstract
Recently, latent action learning, pioneered by Latent Action Policies (LAPO), have shown remarkable pre-training efficiency on observation-only data, offering potential for leveraging vast amounts of video available on the web for embodied AI. However, prior work has focused on distractor-free data, where changes between observations are primarily explained by ground-truth actions. Unfortunately, real-world videos contain action-correlated distractors that may hinder latent action learning. Using Distracting Control Suite (DCS) we empirically investigate the effect of distractors on latent action learning and demonstrate that LAPO struggle in such scenario. We propose LAOM, a simple LAPO modification that improves the quality of latent actions by 8x, as measured by linear probing. Importantly, we show that providing supervision with ground-truth actions, as few as 2.5% of the full dataset, during latent action learning improves downstream performance by 4.2x on average. Our findings suggest that integrating supervision during Latent Action Models (LAM) training is critical in the presence of distractors, challenging the conventional pipeline of first learning LAM and only then decoding from latent to ground-truth actions.
Alexander Nikulin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Andrei Polubarov, Igor Kiselev, Vladislav Kurenkov
ICML4
2025 Vintix: Action Model via In-Context Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In-Context Reinforcement Learning (ICRL) represents a promising paradigm for developing generalist agents that learn at inference time through trial-and-error interactions, analogous to how large language models adapt contextually, but with a focus on reward maximization. However, the scalability of ICRL beyond toy tasks and single-domain settings remains an open challenge. In this work, we present the first steps toward scaling ICRL by introducing a fixed, cross-domain model capable of learning behaviors through in-context reinforcement learning. Our results demonstrate that Algorithm Distillation, a framework designed to facilitate ICRL, offers a compelling and competitive alternative to expert distillation to construct versatile action models. These findings highlight the potential of ICRL as a scalable approach for generalist decision-making systems.
Andrei Polubarov, Nikita Lyubaykin, Alexander Derevyagin, Ilya Zisman, Denis Tarasov, Alexander Nikulin, Vladislav Kurenkov
ICML2