Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric Volkmann
dblp:392/9484
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural field |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
3d shape generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design
generative design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Geometry-Informed Neural Networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A scalable generative model for dynamical system reconstruction from neuroimaging data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A scalable generative model for dynamical system reconstruction from neuroimaging data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural field · 1.7constraint-based training · 1.7teacher forcing · 0.8fMRI · 0.8control theory · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Geometry-Informed Neural NetworksabstractGeometry is a ubiquitous tool in computer graphics, design, and engineering. However, the lack of large shape datasets limits the application of state-of-the-art supervised learning methods and motivates the exploration of alternative learning strategies. To this end, we introduce geometry-informed neural networks (GINNs) -- a framework for training shape-generative neural fields without data by leveraging user-specified design requirements in the form of objectives and constraints. By adding diversity as an explicit constraint, GINNs avoid mode-collapse and can generate multiple diverse solutions, often required in geometry tasks. Experimentally, we apply GINNs to several problems spanning physics, geometry, and engineering design, showing control over geometrical and topological properties, such as surface smoothness or the number of holes. These results demonstrate the potential of training shape-generative models without data, paving the way for new generative design approaches without large datasets. Arturs Berzins, Andreas Radler, Eric Volkmann, Sebastian Sanokowski, Sepp Hochreiter, Johannes Brandstetter |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | A scalable generative model for dynamical system reconstruction from neuroimaging dataabstractData-driven inference of the generative dynamics underlying a set of observed time series is of growing interest in machine learning and the natural sciences. In neuroscience, such methods promise to alleviate the need to handcraft models based on biophysical principles and allow to automatize the inference of inter-individual differences in brain dynamics.
Recent breakthroughs in training techniques for state space models (SSMs) specifically geared toward dynamical systems (DS) reconstruction (DSR) enable to recover the underlying system including its geometrical (attractor) and long-term statistical invariants from even short time series. These techniques are based on control-theoretic ideas, like modern variants of teacher forcing (TF), to ensure stable loss gradient propagation while training.
However, as it currently stands, these techniques are not directly applicable to data modalities where current observations depend on an entire history of previous states due to a signal’s filtering properties, as common in neuroscience (and physiology more generally).
Prominent examples are the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or Ca$^{2+}$ imaging data.
Such types of signals render the SSM's decoder model non-invertible, a requirement for previous TF-based methods.
Here, exploiting the recent success of control techniques for training SSMs, we propose a novel algorithm that solves this problem and scales exceptionally well with model dimensionality and filter length. We demonstrate its efficiency in reconstructing dynamical systems, including their state space geometry and long-term temporal properties, from just short BOLD time series. Eric Volkmann, Alena Brändle, Daniel Durstewitz, Georgia Koppe |
NeurIPS | 1 |