Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinyao Jiao

dblp:393/0527 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
RTL verification
2.632025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
UVLLM: An Automated Universal RTL Verification Framework using LLMs · DAC 2025
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification › assertion-based verification
assertion failure debugging
1.722025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
1.722025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.912025
UVLLM: An Automated Universal RTL Verification Framework using LLMs · DAC 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.522025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025
Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design · DAC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 4.4synthetic training data · 3.5error response learning · 3.5universal verification methodology · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 UVLLM: An Automated Universal RTL Verification Framework using LLMs
abstract
Verifying hardware designs in embedded systems is crucial but often labor-intensive and time-consuming. While existing solutions have improved automation, they frequently rely on unrealistic assumptions. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel framework, UVLLM, which combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with the Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) to relax these assumptions. UVLLM significantly enhances the automation of testing and repairing error-prone Register Transfer Level (RTL) codes, a critical aspect of verification development. Unlike existing methods, UVLLM ensures that all errors are triggered during verification, achieving a syntax error fix rate of 86.99% and a functional error fix rate of 71.92% on our proposed benchmark. These results demonstrate a substantial improvement in verification efficiency. Additionally, our study highlights the current limitations of LLM applications, particularly their reliance on extensive training data. We emphasize the transformative potential of LLMs in hardware design verification and suggest promising directions for future research in AI-driven hardware design methodologies. The Repo. of dataset and code: https://github.com/SEU-ACAL/reproduce-UVLLM-DAC-25/.
Junhao Ye, Xinyao Jiao, Dingrong Pan, Jie Zhou 0001, Ning Wang 0071, Weiwei Shan, Xinwei Fang, Xi Wang 0009, Nan Guan, Zhe Jiang 0004
DAC6
2025 Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design
abstract
SystemVerilog Assertions (SVAs) are essential for verifying Register Transfer Level (RTL) designs, as they can be embedded into key functional paths to detect unintended behaviours. During simulation, assertion failures occur when the design’s behaviour deviates from expectations. Solving these failures, i.e., identifying and fixing the issues causing the deviation, requires analysing complex logical and timing relationships between multiple signals. This process heavily relies on human expertise, and there is currently no automatic tool available to assist with it. Here, we present AssertSolver, an opensource Large Language Model (LLM) specifically designed for solving assertion failures. By leveraging synthetic training data and learning from error responses to challenging cases, AssertSolver achieves a bug-fixing pass@1 metric of 88.54% on our testbench, significantly outperforming OpenAI’s o1-preview by up to $\mathbf{1 1. 9 7 \%}$. We release our model and testbench for public access to encourage further research: https://github.com/SEU-ACAL/reproduce-AssertSolver-DAC-25.
Jie Zhou 0001, Youshu Ji, Ning Wang 0071, Xinyao Jiao, Bingkun Yao, Xinwei Fang, Shuai Zhao 0004, Nan Guan, Zhe Jiang 0004
DAC5
2025 Insights from Rights and Wrongs: A Large Language Model for Solving Assertion Failures in RTL Design
abstract
SystemVerilog Assertions (SVAs) are essential for verifying Register Transfer Level (RTL) designs, as they can be embedded into key functional paths to detect unintended behaviours. During simulation, assertion failures occur when the design’s behaviour deviates from expectations. Solving these failures, i.e., identifying and fixing the issues causing the deviation, requires analysing complex logical and timing relationships between multiple signals. This process heavily relies on human expertise, and there is currently no automatic tool available to assist with it. Here, we present AssertSolver, an opensource Large Language Model (LLM) specifically designed for solving assertion failures. By leveraging synthetic training data and learning from error responses to challenging cases, AssertSolver achieves a bug-fixing pass@1 metric of $88.54 \%$ on our testbench, significantly outperforming OpenAI’s o1-preview by up to $\mathbf{1 1. 9 7 \%}$. We release our model and testbench for public access to encourage further research: https://github.com/SEU-ACAL/reproduce-AssertSolver-DAC-25.
Jie Zhou 0001, Youshu Ji, Ning Wang 0071, Xinyao Jiao, Bingkun Yao, Xinwei Fang, Shuai Zhao 0004, Nan Guan, Zhe Jiang 0004
DAC5