EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huangyi Deng
dblp:393/1452
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-0802-6431ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-view classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-view classification
trusted multi-view classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical opinion aggregation · 1.0dempster-shafer evidence theory · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Trustworthy data recovery for incomplete multi-view learning
Huangyi Deng, Ningning Pan, Chuanqing Tang, Long Shi 0002 |
Signal Process. | 1 |
| 2026 | Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion AggregationabstractRecently, multi-view learning has witnessed a considerable interest on the research of trusted decision-making. Previous methods are mainly inspired from an important paper published by Han et al. in 2021, which formulates a Trusted Multi-view Classification (TMC) framework that aggregates evidence from different views based on Dempster's combination rule. All these methods only consider inter-view aggregation, yet lacking exploitation of intra-view information. In this paper, we propose a generalized trusted multi-view classification framework with hierarchical opinion aggregation. This hierarchical framework includes a two-phase aggregation process: the intra-view and inter-view aggregation hierarchies. In the intra aggregation, we assume that each view is comprised of common information shared with other views, as well as its specific information. We then aggregate both the common and specific information. This aggregation phase is useful to eliminate the feature noise inherent to view itself, thereby improving the view quality. In the inter-view aggregation, we design an attention mechanism at the evidence level to facilitate opinion aggregation from different views. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the pioneering efforts to formulate a hierarchical aggregation framework in the trusted multi-view learning domain. Extensive experiments show that our model outperforms some state-of-art trust-related baselines. One can access the source code onhttps://github.com/lshi91/GTMC-HOA. Long Shi 0002, Chuanqing Tang, Huangyi Deng, Lei Xing 0003, Badong Chen |
IEEE Trans. Multim. | 3 |