Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arshia Hemmat

dblp:393/1859 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 38% 3D vision · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
shape perception
0.812024
Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.812024
Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
perception robustness
0.212024
Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.212024
Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark evaluation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluating Abstract Shape Recognition in Vision-Language Models
abstract
Despite the importance of shape perception in human vision, early neural image classifiers relied less on shape information for object recognition than other (often spurious) features. While recent research suggests that current large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) exhibit more reliance on shape, we find them to still be seriously limited in this regard. To quantify such limitations, we introduce IllusionBench, a dataset that challenges current cutting-edge VLMs to decipher shape information when the shape is represented by an arrangement of visual elements in a scene. Our extensive evaluations reveal that, while these shapes are easily detectable by human annotators, current VLMs struggle to recognize them, indicating important avenues for future work in developing more robust visual perception systems. The full dataset and codebase are available at: https://arshiahemmat.github.io/illusionbench/
Arshia Hemmat, Adam Davies, Tom A. Lamb, Jianhao Yuan, Philip Torr 0001, Ashkan Khakzar, Francesco Pinto
NeurIPS1