Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rui Mao 0017
dblp:393/1922
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 41% 3D vision · 26% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 VidComposition: Can MLLMs Analyze Compositions in Compiled Videos? · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry › camera geometry
perspective geometry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
spatial consistency |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VidComposition: Can MLLMs Analyze Compositions in Compiled Videos?abstractThe advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has enabled significant progress in multi-modal understanding, expanding their capacity to analyze video content. However, existing evaluation benchmarks for MLLMs primarily focus on abstract video comprehension, lacking a detailed assessment of their ability to understand video compositions, the nuanced interpretation of how visual elements combine and interact within highly compiled video contexts. We introduce VidComposition, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the video composition understanding capabilities of MLLMs using carefully curated compiled videos and cinematic-level annotations. VidComposition includes 982 videos with 1706 multiple-choice questions, covering various compositional aspects such as camera movement, angle, shot size, narrative structure, character actions and emotions, etc. Our comprehensive evaluation of 33 open-source and proprietary MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap between human and model capabilities. This highlights the limitations of current MLLMs in understanding complex, compiled video compositions and offers insights into areas for further improvement. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://yunlong10.github.io/VidComposition/. Yunlong Tang 0002, Junjia Guo, Hang Hua, Susan Liang, Mingqian Feng, Rui Mao 0017, Chao Huang 0033, Jing Bi 0002, Zeliang Zhang 0001, Pooyan Fazli, Chenliang Xu |
CVPR | 7 |
| 2025 | MMPerspective: Do MLLMs Understand Perspective? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and RobustnessabstractUnderstanding perspective is fundamental to human visual perception, yet the extent to which multimodal large language models (MLLMs) internalize perspective geometry remains unclear. We introduce MMPerspective, the first benchmark specifically designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs' understanding of perspective through 10 carefully crafted tasks across three complementary dimensions: Perspective Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness. Our benchmark comprises 2,711 real-world and synthetic image instances with 5,083 question-answer pairs that probe key capabilities, such as vanishing point perception and counting, perspective type reasoning, line relationship understanding in 3D space, invariance to perspective-preserving transformations, etc. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 43 state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover significant limitations: while models demonstrate competence on surface-level perceptual tasks, they struggle with compositional reasoning and maintaining spatial consistency under perturbations. Our analysis further reveals intriguing patterns between model architecture, scale, and perspective capabilities, highlighting both robustness bottlenecks and the benefits of chain-of-thought prompting. MMPerspective establishes a valuable testbed for diagnosing and advancing spatial understanding in vision-language systems. Resources are available at https://yunlong10.github.io/MMPerspective/ Yunlong Tang 0002, Pinxin Liu, Mingqian Feng, Zhangyun Tan, Rui Mao 0017, Chao Huang 0033, Jing Bi 0002, Yunzhong Xiao, Susan Liang, Hang Hua, Ali Vosoughi, Luchuan Song, Zeliang Zhang 0001, Chenliang Xu |
NeurIPS | 5 |