Osamah Abduljalil

dblp:393/2024 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-5184-2925ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
1.012026
CI/CD Configuration Practices in Open Source Android Apps: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management
1.012026
CI/CD Configuration Practices in Open Source Android Apps: An Empirical Study · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 1.0empirical study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CI/CD Configuration Practices in Open Source Android Apps: An Empirical Study
abstract
Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) is a well-established practice that automatically builds, tests, packages, and deploys software systems. To adopt CI/CD, software developers need to configure their projects using dedicated YML configuration files. Mobile apps have distinct characteristics with respect to CI/CD practices, such as testing on various emulators and deploying to app stores. However, little is known about the challenges and added value of adopting CI/CD in mobile apps and how developers maintain such a practice. In this article, we conduct an empirical study on CI/CD practices in \(2{,}557\) Android apps adopting 4 popular CI/CD services, namely GitHub Actions, Travis CI, CircleCI, and GitLab CI/CD. We also compare our findings with those reported in prior research on general CI/CD practices to situate them within broader trends. We observe a lack of commonality and standardization across CI/CD services and Android apps, leading to complex YML configurations and associated maintenance efforts. We also observe that CI/CD configurations focus primarily on the build setup, with around half of the projects performing standard testing and only 9% incorporating deployment. In addition, we find that CI/CD configurations are changed bi-monthly on average, with frequent maintenance correlating with active issue tracking, project size/age, and community engagement. Our qualitative analysis of commits uncovered 11 themes in CI/CD maintenance activities, with over a third of the changes focusing on improving workflows and fixing build issues, whereas another third involves updating the build environment, tools, and dependencies. Our study emphasizes the necessity for automation and AI-powered tools to improve CI/CD processes for mobile apps and advocates creating adaptable open source tools to efficiently manage resources, especially in testing and deployment.
Taher Ahmed Ghaleb, Osamah Abduljalil, Safwat Hassan
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2