Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhiram Kusumba

dblp:393/2724 · also Naga Sai Abhiram Kusumba · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 31% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Vision and language · 22%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
concept unlearning
0.912025
EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning
0.912025
EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
CLIP
0.812024
TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.812024
TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › negative sampling
hard negative mining
0.812024
TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.812024
TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining
0.812024
TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks
0.312025
EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative flow networks
trajectory balance
0.312025
EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory balance objective · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9GFlowNets · 0.9text-to-image generator · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 EraseFlow: Learning Concept Erasure Policies via GFlowNet-Driven Alignment
abstract
Erasing harmful or proprietary concepts from powerful text‑to‑image generators is an emerging safety requirement, yet current ``concept erasure'' techniques either collapse image quality, rely on brittle adversarial losses, or demand prohibitive retraining cycles. We trace these limitations to a myopic view of the denoising trajectories that govern diffusion‑based generation. We introduce EraseFlow, the first framework that casts concept unlearning as exploration in the space of denoising paths and optimizes it with a GFlowNets equipped with the trajectory‑balance objective. By sampling entire trajectories rather than single end states, EraseFlow learns a stochastic policy that steers generation away from target concepts while preserving the model’s prior. EraseFlow eliminates the need for carefully crafted reward models and by doing this, it generalizes effectively to unseen concepts and avoids hackable rewards while improving the performance. Extensive empirical results demonstrate that EraseFlow outperforms existing baselines and achieves an optimal trade-off between performance and prior preservation.
Abhiram Kusumba, Maitreya Patel, Kyle Min 0001, Changhoon Kim, Chitta Baral, Yezhou Yang
NeurIPS1
2024 TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negatives
abstract
Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) models maximize the mutual information between text and visual modalities to learn representations. This makes the nature of the training data a significant factor in the efficacy of CLIP for downstream tasks. However, the lack of compositional diversity in contemporary image-text datasets limits the compositional reasoning ability of CLIP. We show that generating ``hard'' negative captions via in-context learning and synthesizing corresponding negative images with text-to-image generators offers a solution. We introduce a novel contrastive pre-training strategy that leverages these hard negative captions and images in an alternating fashion to train CLIP. We demonstrate that our method, named TripletCLIP, when applied to existing datasets such as CC3M and CC12M, enhances the compositional capabilities of CLIP, resulting in an absolute improvement of over 9% on the SugarCrepe benchmark on an equal computational budget, as well as improvements in zero-shot image classification and image retrieval. Our code, models, and data are available at: tripletclip.github.io.
Maitreya Patel, Abhiram Kusumba, Changhoon Kim, Tejas Gokhale, Chitta Baral, Yezhou Yang
NeurIPS2