Chuanqing Tang

dblp:393/3191 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-1611-7155ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning paradigms · 64% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
1.012026
Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
long-tailed recognition
1.012026
Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-view classification
1.012026
Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multi-view learning
1.012026
Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-view classification
trusted multi-view classification
1.012026
Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › multimodal trustworthiness
trusted multi-view learning
1.012026
Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.312026
Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty-guided data generation · 1.0opinion aggregation · 1.0hierarchical opinion aggregation · 1.0dempster-shafer evidence theory · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0SMOTE · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Trusted Multi-view Learning for Long-tailed Classification
abstract
Class imbalance has been extensively studied in single-view scenarios; however, addressing this challenge in multi-view contexts remains an open problem, with even scarcer research focusing on trustworthy solutions. In this paper, we tackle a particularly challenging class imbalance problem in multi-view scenarios: long-tailed classification. We propose TMLC, a Trusted Multi-view Long-tailed Classification framework, which makes contributions on two critical aspects: opinion aggregation and pseudo-data generation. Specifically, inspired by Social Identity Theory, we design a group consensus opinion aggregation mechanism that guides decision-making toward the direction favored by the majority of the group. In terms of pseudo-data generation, we introduce a novel distance metric to adapt SMOTE for multi-view scenarios and develop an uncertainty-guided data generation module that produces high-quality pseudo-data, effectively mitigating the adverse effects of class imbalance. Extensive experiments on long-tailed multi-view datasets demonstrate that our model is capable of achieving superior performance.
Chuanqing Tang, Guanghao Lin, Lei Xing 0003, Long Shi 0002
AAAI1
2026 Trustworthy data recovery for incomplete multi-view learning
Huangyi Deng, Ningning Pan, Chuanqing Tang, Long Shi 0002
Signal Process.3
2026 Generalized Trusted Multi-View Classification Framework With Hierarchical Opinion Aggregation
abstract
Recently, multi-view learning has witnessed a considerable interest on the research of trusted decision-making. Previous methods are mainly inspired from an important paper published by Han et al. in 2021, which formulates a Trusted Multi-view Classification (TMC) framework that aggregates evidence from different views based on Dempster's combination rule. All these methods only consider inter-view aggregation, yet lacking exploitation of intra-view information. In this paper, we propose a generalized trusted multi-view classification framework with hierarchical opinion aggregation. This hierarchical framework includes a two-phase aggregation process: the intra-view and inter-view aggregation hierarchies. In the intra aggregation, we assume that each view is comprised of common information shared with other views, as well as its specific information. We then aggregate both the common and specific information. This aggregation phase is useful to eliminate the feature noise inherent to view itself, thereby improving the view quality. In the inter-view aggregation, we design an attention mechanism at the evidence level to facilitate opinion aggregation from different views. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the pioneering efforts to formulate a hierarchical aggregation framework in the trusted multi-view learning domain. Extensive experiments show that our model outperforms some state-of-art trust-related baselines. One can access the source code onhttps://github.com/lshi91/GTMC-HOA.
Long Shi 0002, Chuanqing Tang, Huangyi Deng, Lei Xing 0003, Badong Chen
IEEE Trans. Multim.2
2025 Unified and efficient multi-view clustering with tensorized bipartite graph
Zhenzhu Chen, Chuanqing Tang, Huaming Du, Yu Zhao 0019, Qing Li 0005, Long Shi 0002
Expert Syst. Appl.3