EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicolas Wolf
dblp:393/3834
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 89% Deep learning architectures and training · 6% 3D vision · 5% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 83% Computational science and engineering · 17% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
2.5 | 3 | 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometry · NeurIPS 2025 Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching · ICML 2025 Generating Highly Designable Proteins with Geometric Algebra Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometry · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
conformational sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometry · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometry · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Highly Designable Proteins with Geometric Algebra Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
0.5 | 2 | 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometry · NeurIPS 2025 Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matching · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generating Highly Designable Proteins with Geometric Algebra Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
flow matching · 3.5molecular dynamics · 1.7geometric encoding · 1.7equivariant neural network · 1.7invariant point attention · 0.8higher-order message passing · 0.8clifford frame attention · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Flexibility-conditioned protein structure design with flow matchingabstractRecent advances in geometric deep learning and generative modeling have enabled the design of novel proteins with a wide range of desired properties. However, current state-of-the-art approaches are typically restricted to generating proteins with only static target properties, such as motifs and symmetries. In this work, we take a step towards overcoming this limitation by proposing a framework to condition structure generation on flexibility, which is crucial for key functionalities such as catalysis or molecular recognition. We first introduce BackFlip, an equivariant neural network for predicting per-residue flexibility from an input backbone structure. Relying on BackFlip, we propose FliPS, an SE(3)-equivariant conditional flow matching model that solves the inverse problem, that is, generating backbones that display a target flexibility profile. In our experiments, we show that FliPS is able to generate novel and diverse protein backbones with the desired flexibility, verified by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. FliPS and BackFlip are available at https://github.com/graeter-group/flips. Vsevolod Viliuga, Leif Seute, Nicolas Wolf, Simon Wagner, Arne Elofsson, Jan Stühmer, Frauke Gräter |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | Learning conformational ensembles of proteins based on backbone geometryabstractDeep generative models have recently been proposed for sampling protein conformations from the Boltzmann distribution, as an alternative to often prohibitively expensive Molecular Dynamics simulations. However, current state-of-the-art approaches rely on fine-tuning pre-trained folding models and evolutionary sequence information, limiting their applicability and efficiency, and introducing potential biases. In this work, we propose a flow matching model for sampling protein conformations based solely on backbone geometry - BBFlow. We introduce a geometric encoding of the backbone equilibrium structure as input and propose to condition not only the flow but also the prior distribution on the respective equilibrium structure, eliminating the need for evolutionary information. The resulting model is orders of magnitudes faster than current state-of-the-art approaches at comparable accuracy, is transferable to multi-chain proteins, and can be trained from scratch in a few GPU days. In our experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model achieves competitive performance with reduced inference time, across not only an established benchmark of naturally occurring proteins but also de novo proteins, for which evolutionary information is scarce or absent. BBFlow is available at https://github.com/graeter-group/bbflow. Nicolas Wolf, Leif Seute, Vsevolod Viliuga, Simon Wagner, Jan Stühmer, Frauke Gräter |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Generating Highly Designable Proteins with Geometric Algebra Flow MatchingabstractWe introduce a generative model for protein backbone design utilizing geometric products and higher order message passing. In particular, we propose Clifford Frame Attention (CFA), an extension of the invariant point attention (IPA) architecture from AlphaFold2, in which the backbone residue frames and geometric features are represented in the projective geometric algebra. This enables to construct geometrically expressive messages between residues, including higher order terms, using the bilinear operations of the algebra. We evaluate our architecture by incorporating it into the framework of FrameFlow, a state-of-the-art flow matching model for protein backbone generation. The proposed model achieves high designability, diversity and novelty, while also sampling protein backbones that follow the statistical distribution of secondary structure elements found in naturally occurring proteins, a property so far only insufficiently achieved by many state-of-the-art generative models. Simon Wagner, Leif Seute, Vsevolod Viliuga, Nicolas Wolf, Frauke Gräter, Jan Stühmer |
NeurIPS | 4 |