Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lanlan Lu

dblp:394/1235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-6166-1690ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
1.012026
Who Should I Trust? Explicit Confidence-Focused Multimodal Intent Recognition · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal dialogue
multimodal intent recognition
1.012026
Who Should I Trust? Explicit Confidence-Focused Multimodal Intent Recognition · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.012026
Who Should I Trust? Explicit Confidence-Focused Multimodal Intent Recognition · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal transformer · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Who Should I Trust? Explicit Confidence-Focused Multimodal Intent Recognition
abstract
Multimodal intent recognition is aimed at understanding user intentions by integrating information from multiple modalities. It has attracted increasing attention in recently developed dialog systems. The existing studies have focused mainly on modeling semantic interactions within and across modalities, but they often overlook the reliability of each modality. In real-world scenarios, inputs may be corrupted by noisy audio, blurred or occluded videos, or ambiguous text, making it difficult for the employed model to determine who to trust and how much to trust. To address this challenge, we propose a method called explicit confidence-focused multimodal intent recognition (ECFMIR). The core idea of this approach is to assign each modality and each cross-modal associations feature a dedicated confidence lens (CLens) that explicitly estimates the confidence level in a hypothetical manner. This design helps reduce the degree of uncertainty and mitigate the risk of incorrect predictions when addressing conflicting inputs. Comprehensive experiments conducted on two benchmark multimodal intent recognition datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. A further analysis reveals that ECFMIR achieves significant advantages for high-conflict categories and under low-resource conditions.
Qimeng Yang, Lanlan Lu
AAAI3
2026 Structure Aware Distillation for Multimodal Intent Understanding Under Missing Modalities
abstract
Multimodal intent detection leverages complementary information from diverse sensors to achieve precise semantic understanding; however, existing methodologies predominantly operate under the ideal assumption of modality completeness. In practical deployments, missing modalities, stemming from sensor failure, background noise, or privacy constraints, are inevitable and uncertain, leading to severe performance degradation. To address this challenge, we propose SADF, a Structure Aware Distillation Framework designed to facilitate robust cross-level knowledge transfer from a full-modality teacher to a partial-modality student. At the semantic level, semantic topology distillation aligns prototype similarity distributions between the teacher and the student, capturing class topology and hierarchical relations. At the discriminative level, boundary aware distillation decouples predictions into target and nontarget classes, enforcing alignment with the teacher to enhance discriminability and suppress noise. By integrating these strategies, SADF enables the student to learn robust representations and decisions when uncertain modalities are missing. The results of experiments based on two benchmarks demonstrate that SADF consistently outperforms strong baselines.
Lanlan Lu, Qimeng Yang, Xin-jun Pei, Jinmiao Song
ICMR1
2026 SaliText: A multimodal intent recognition method with saliency and text-guided fusion
Qimeng Yang, Yichao Xia, Lanlan Lu, Qixing Wei
Signal Process.4
2025 Improving Intent Detection with Hierarchical Multimodal Representation and Triplet Contrastive Learning
Lanlan Lu, Qimeng Yang
PRICAI1
2025 GFIDF:gradual fusion intent detection framework
Qimeng Yang, Lanlan Lu
J. Supercomput.3