Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Moonmoon Mohanty
dblp:394/2514
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-6703-6875ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 25% Cloud and datacenter computing · 25% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling › task graph scheduling
fork-join scheduling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
heterogeneous server scheduling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
numerical experiments · 0.8asymptotic independence analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel ServersabstractThis paper investigates the$(k,k)$fork-join scheduling scheme on a system of n parallel servers comprising both slow and fast servers. Tasks arriving in the system are divided into k sub-tasks and assigned to a random set of k servers, where each task can be assigned independently to a distinct slow or fast server with selection probability$p_{s}$or$1-p_{s}$, respectively. Our analysis demonstrates that the joint distribution of the stationary workload across any set of k queues becomes asymptotically independent as the number of servers n grows, with k scaling as$o\left ({{n^{\frac {1}{4}}}}\right)$. Under asymptotic independence, the limiting mean task completion time can be expressed as an integral. However, it is analytically challenging to compute the optimal selection probability$p_{s}^{\ast } $that minimizes this integral. To address this, we provide an upper bound on the limiting mean task completion time and identify the selection probability$\hat {p}_{s}$that minimizes this bound. We validate that this selection probability$\hat {p}_{s}$yields a near-optimal performance through numerical experiments. Moonmoon Mohanty, Gaurav Gautam, Vaneet Aggarwal, Parimal Parag |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 1 |