Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Moonmoon Mohanty

dblp:394/2514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-6703-6875ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 25% Cloud and datacenter computing · 25%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling › task graph scheduling
fork-join scheduling
0.812024
Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
heterogeneous server scheduling
0.812024
Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.812024
Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

numerical experiments · 0.8asymptotic independence analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Analysis of Fork-Join Scheduling on Heterogeneous Parallel Servers
abstract
This paper investigates the$(k,k)$fork-join scheduling scheme on a system of n parallel servers comprising both slow and fast servers. Tasks arriving in the system are divided into k sub-tasks and assigned to a random set of k servers, where each task can be assigned independently to a distinct slow or fast server with selection probability$p_{s}$or$1-p_{s}$, respectively. Our analysis demonstrates that the joint distribution of the stationary workload across any set of k queues becomes asymptotically independent as the number of servers n grows, with k scaling as$o\left ({{n^{\frac {1}{4}}}}\right)$. Under asymptotic independence, the limiting mean task completion time can be expressed as an integral. However, it is analytically challenging to compute the optimal selection probability$p_{s}^{\ast } $that minimizes this integral. To address this, we provide an upper bound on the limiting mean task completion time and identify the selection probability$\hat {p}_{s}$that minimizes this bound. We validate that this selection probability$\hat {p}_{s}$yields a near-optimal performance through numerical experiments.
Moonmoon Mohanty, Gaurav Gautam, Vaneet Aggarwal, Parimal Parag
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1