EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna C. Schaar
dblp:394/4378
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1063-005XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
spatial omics |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods generalize well to spatial chromatin accessibility data · Bioinform. 2025 GraphCompass: spatial metrics for differential analyses of cell organization across conditions · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9spatial statistics · 0.8graph analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods generalize well to spatial chromatin accessibility dataabstractMOTIVATION: Spatially resolved chromatin accessibility profiling offers the potential to investigate gene regulatory processes within the spatial context of tissues. However, current methods typically work at spot resolution, aggregating measurements from multiple cells, thereby obscuring cell-type-specific spatial patterns of accessibility. Spot deconvolution methods have been developed and extensively benchmarked for spatial transcriptomics, yet no dedicated methods exist for spatial chromatin accessibility, and it is unclear if RNA-based approaches are applicable to that modality. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate that these RNA-based approaches can be applied to spot-based chromatin accessibility data by a systematic evaluation of five top-performing spatial transcriptomics deconvolution methods. To assess performance, we developed a simulation framework that generates both transcriptomic and accessibility spot data from dissociated single-cell and targeted multiomic datasets, enabling direct comparisons across both data modalities. Our results show that Cell2location and RCTD, in contrast to other methods, exhibit robust performance on spatial chromatin accessibility data, achieving accuracy comparable to RNA-based deconvolution. Generally, we observed that RNA-based deconvolution exhibited slightly better performance compared to chromatin accessibility-based deconvolution, especially for resolving rare cell types, indicating room for future development of specialized methods. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that existing deconvolution methods can be readily applied to chromatin accessibility-based spatial data. Our work provides a simulation framework and establishes a performance baseline to guide the development and evaluation of methods optimized for spatial epigenomics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All methods, simulation frameworks, peak selection strategies, analysis notebooks and scripts are available at https://github.com/theislab/deconvATAC. Sarah Ouologuem, Laura D. Martens, Anna C. Schaar, Maiia Shulman, Julien Gagneur, Fabian J. Theis |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2024 | GraphCompass: spatial metrics for differential analyses of cell organization across conditionsabstractSUMMARY: Spatial omics technologies are increasingly leveraged to characterize how disease disrupts tissue organization and cellular niches. While multiple methods to analyze spatial variation within a sample have been published, statistical and computational approaches to compare cell spatial organization across samples or conditions are mostly lacking. We present GraphCompass, a comprehensive set of omics-adapted graph analysis methods to quantitatively evaluate and compare the spatial arrangement of cells in samples representing diverse biological conditions. GraphCompass builds upon the Squidpy spatial omics toolbox and encompasses various statistical approaches to perform cross-condition analyses at the level of individual cell types, niches, and samples. Additionally, GraphCompass provides custom visualization functions that enable effective communication of results. We demonstrate how GraphCompass can be used to address key biological questions, such as how cellular organization and tissue architecture differ across various disease states and which spatial patterns correlate with a given pathological condition. GraphCompass can be applied to various popular omics techniques, including, but not limited to, spatial proteomics (e.g. MIBI-TOF), spot-based transcriptomics (e.g. 10× Genomics Visium), and single-cell resolved transcriptomics (e.g. Stereo-seq). In this work, we showcase the capabilities of GraphCompass through its application to three different studies that may also serve as benchmark datasets for further method development. With its easy-to-use implementation, extensive documentation, and comprehensive tutorials, GraphCompass is accessible to biologists with varying levels of computational expertise. By facilitating comparative analyses of cell spatial organization, GraphCompass promises to be a valuable asset in advancing our understanding of tissue function in health and disease. . Mayar Ali, Merel Kuijs, Soroor Hediyeh-Zadeh, Tim Treis, Karin Hrovatin, Giovanni Palla, Anna C. Schaar, Fabian J. Theis |
Bioinform. | 7 |