Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Denghui Xie
dblp:394/5038
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8697-2278ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Recommender systems › e-commerce recommendation
complementary recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
logical reasoning network · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | High-order complementary cloud application programming interface recommendation with logical reasoning for incremental development
Zhen Chen 0007, Denghui Xie, Dianlong You |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2025 | A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API RecommendationabstractCloud API recommender system has emerged as a promising solution to address the overload problem caused by the overwhelming growth of cloud APIs, aiming to improve software development efficiency. However, the incremental development nature of the service-oriented software necessitates an adaptive complementary cloud API recommender system, while existing systems purely focus on generating single-function, high-quality, and personalized recommendations based on retrieval content, quality of service, or user preferences, and overlook the practical scenarios that recommend high-order complementary cloud APIs for developers. This paper addresses this gap by providing a logical reasoning network for high-order complementary cloud API recommendation (LRN4HCAR). We first construct three relation graphs to characterize cloud API co-invocation, function co-occurrence, and substitute relations, capturing the strong complementarity, weak complementarity, and non-substitute relations among cloud APIs. Next, we develop a high-order complementary logical reasoning network with three sub-networks: strong complementary logical reasoning, weak complementary logical reasoning, and non-substitute logical reasoning. This network enables the recommendation of cloud APIs with high-order complementary relationships while excluding substitutes. Utilizing LRN4HCAR, we evaluate classic and SOTA baselines across various complementary recommendation scenarios on two real-world datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that LRN4HCAR outperforms others in all experimental settings for complementary cloud API recommendations. We also verify the ability of LRN4HCAR to handle substitute noise and improve the visibility of long-tail cloud APIs in the recommendation results. The implementation code has made publicly available athttps://github.com/hey-mem/LRN4HCAR. Zhen Chen 0007, Denghui Xie, Yueshen Xu, Dianlong You |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 2 |