Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denghui Xie

dblp:394/5038 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8697-2278ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.912025
A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025
Recommender systems › e-commerce recommendation
complementary recommendation
0.912025
A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API Recommendation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logical reasoning network · 1.7graph neural network · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 High-order complementary cloud application programming interface recommendation with logical reasoning for incremental development
Zhen Chen 0007, Denghui Xie, Dianlong You
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.2
2025 A Logical Reasoning Network for High-Order Complementary Cloud API Recommendation
abstract
Cloud API recommender system has emerged as a promising solution to address the overload problem caused by the overwhelming growth of cloud APIs, aiming to improve software development efficiency. However, the incremental development nature of the service-oriented software necessitates an adaptive complementary cloud API recommender system, while existing systems purely focus on generating single-function, high-quality, and personalized recommendations based on retrieval content, quality of service, or user preferences, and overlook the practical scenarios that recommend high-order complementary cloud APIs for developers. This paper addresses this gap by providing a logical reasoning network for high-order complementary cloud API recommendation (LRN4HCAR). We first construct three relation graphs to characterize cloud API co-invocation, function co-occurrence, and substitute relations, capturing the strong complementarity, weak complementarity, and non-substitute relations among cloud APIs. Next, we develop a high-order complementary logical reasoning network with three sub-networks: strong complementary logical reasoning, weak complementary logical reasoning, and non-substitute logical reasoning. This network enables the recommendation of cloud APIs with high-order complementary relationships while excluding substitutes. Utilizing LRN4HCAR, we evaluate classic and SOTA baselines across various complementary recommendation scenarios on two real-world datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that LRN4HCAR outperforms others in all experimental settings for complementary cloud API recommendations. We also verify the ability of LRN4HCAR to handle substitute noise and improve the visibility of long-tail cloud APIs in the recommendation results. The implementation code has made publicly available athttps://github.com/hey-mem/LRN4HCAR.
Zhen Chen 0007, Denghui Xie, Yueshen Xu, Dianlong You
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.2