Ling-Chieh Chang

dblp:394/5701 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1980-3586ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks › optical buffer
optical buffer construction
0.912025
On Constructions of Optical Priority Queues Under a Priority-Based Routing Policy · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Optical networks › optical switching
optical packet switching
0.912025
On Constructions of Optical Priority Queues Under a Priority-Based Routing Policy · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Optical networks › optical switching › optical packet switching
optical priority queue
0.912025
On Constructions of Optical Priority Queues Under a Priority-Based Routing Policy · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault-tolerant architecture
0.312025
On Constructions of Optical Priority Queues Under a Priority-Based Routing Policy · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

switched delay lines · 1.7priority-based routing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On Constructions of Optical Priority Queues Under a Priority-Based Routing Policy
abstract
In this paper, we consider Switched-Delay-Lines (SDL) constructions of optical priority queues by using optical (bufferless) crossbar switches and optical fiber delay lines. In a priority queue, each packet is associated with a priority upon its arrival, the highest-priority packet is sent out from the queue whenever there is a departure request, and the lowest-priority packet is dropped from the queue whenever there is a buffer overflow. Given any system for SDL constructions of optical priority queues, the main research problem is twofold: (i) the design of the routing policy performed by the optical crossbar switches; (ii) the choice of the delays of the optical fiber delay lines. Sarwate and Anantharam are the first to propose a feedback system consisting of an optical$(M+2)\times (M+2)$crossbar switch and M optical fiber delay lines (seeFigure 1inSection I) for SDL constructions of optical priority queues, and they have shown that the largest buffer size that can possibly be achieved by using such a feedback system is$2^{M}$. However, whether this theoretical buffer size$2^{M}$can be achieved or not remains an open research problem. Currently, the best result in the literature was obtained by Cheng et al. and the achieved buffer size is$2^{O(\sqrt {\alpha M})}$, where$\alpha $is a constant that depends on the parameters used in their constructions. In this paper, we consider a discrete-time setting and use a feedback system consisting of an optical crossbar switch and multiple groups of optical first-in first-out (FIFO) multiplexers with delay one (FM1’s) for SDL constructions of optical priority queues under apriority-based routing policy (seeFigure 2inSection I). Our contributions are as follows: (i) We extend and generalize an important class of constructions that contains the optimal constructions in the work of Cheng et al. As a result, we achieve larger buffer sizes and less construction complexities/costs than those by Cheng et al. (ii) We obtain a closed-form expression for the maximum buffer size that is achieved by the optimal construction for the scenario that each group of FM1’s has the same number of FM1’s. (iii) Our constructions possess a salient feature, namely, fault-tolerant capability, that can tolerate the malfunctioning of some FM1’s by using the generalized results obtained in this paper. (iv) We show that our constructions can be implemented by using an optical$(M+2)\times (M+2)$crossbar switch andMoptical fiber delay lines, and achieve a buffer size$2^{O(\sqrt {\alpha M})}$, where$\alpha $is a constant that depends on the parameters used in our constructions and is better, i.e., larger, than that in the work of Cheng et al. in a very broad regime.
Jay Cheng, Hsin-Hung Chou, Ling-Chieh Chang, Shin-Shiang Huang, Hsueh-Wen Tseng, Cheng-Hao Yang
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3