Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nidhish Shah
dblp:394/7202
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 77% Debugging and program repair · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | StackEval: Benchmarking LLMs in Coding Assistance · NeurIPS 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
benchmarking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | StackEval: Benchmarking LLMs in Coding Assistance · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
human annotation · 1.5LLM-as-judge · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | StackEval: Benchmarking LLMs in Coding AssistanceabstractWe present two comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate the performance of language models in coding assistance tasks, covering code writing, debugging, code review, and conceptual understanding. Our main contribution includes two curated datasets: StackEval, a large-scale benchmark derived from Stack Overflow questions, and StackUnseen, a dynamic benchmark featuring the most recent Stack Overflow content. These benchmarks offer novel insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs, particularly in handling new and emerging content. Additionally, we assess LLMs' proficiency as judges for coding tasks using a curated, human-annotated dataset, exploring their evaluation capabilities and potential biases, including whether they favor their own generated solutions. Our findings underscore the potential of these benchmarks to advance LLM development and application in coding assistance. To ensure reproducibility, we publicly share our datasets and evaluation code at https://github.com/ProsusAI/stack-eval. Nidhish Shah, Zülküf Genç, Dogu Araci |
NeurIPS | 1 |