Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nam Anh Dang

dblp:394/8813 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-8080-9268ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 46% Wearable and physiological sensing · 46% Interaction techniques and input · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing
acoustic sensing
0.912025
SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring · CHI 2025
Accessibility and assistive technology › sign language technologies › sign language recognition
fingerspelling recognition
0.912025
SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring · CHI 2025
Accessibility and assistive technology › sign language technologies
sign language recognition
0.912025
SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring · CHI 2025
Wearable and physiological sensing › smart wearable
smart ring
0.912025
SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring · CHI 2025
Interaction techniques and input
text entry
0.312025
SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring · CHI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inertial measurement unit · 0.9deep learning · 0.9connectionist temporal classification · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SpellRing: Recognizing Continuous Fingerspelling in American Sign Language using a Ring
abstract
Fingerspelling is a critical part of American Sign Language (ASL) recognition and has become an accessible optional text entry method for Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) individuals. In this paper, we introduce SpellRing, a single smart ring worn on the thumb that recognizes words continuously fingerspelled in ASL. SpellRing uses active acoustic sensing (via a microphone and speaker) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to track handshape and movement, which are processed through a deep learning algorithm using Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) loss. We evaluated the system with 20 ASL signers (13 fluent and 7 learners), using the MacKenzie-Soukoref Phrase Set of 1,164 words and 100 phrases. Offline evaluation yielded top-1 and top-5 word recognition accuracies of 82.45% (9.67%) and 92.42% (5.70%), respectively. In real-time, the system achieved a word error rate (WER) of 0.099 (0.039) on the phrases. Based on these results, we discuss key lessons and design implications for future minimally obtrusive ASL recognition wearables.
Hyunchul Lim, Nam Anh Dang, Dylan Lee, Tianhong Catherine Yu, Jane Lu, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Yiqi Jin, Yan Ma 0006, Xiaojun Bi 0001, François Guimbretière, Cheng Zhang 0022
CHI2
2025 Exploring the Impact of Emotional Voice Integration in Sign-to-Speech Translators for Deaf-to-Hearing Communication
abstract
Emotional voice communication plays a crucial role in effective daily interactions. Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) individuals, who often have limited use of voice, rely on facial expressions to supplement sign language and convey emotions. However, in American Sign Language (ASL), facial expressions serve not only emotional purposes but also function as linguistic markers that can alter the meaning of signs. This dual role can often confuse non-signers when interpreting a signer's emotional state. In this paper, we present studies that: (1) confirm the challenges non-signers face when interpreting emotions from facial expressions in ASL communication, and (2) demonstrate how integrating emotional voice into translation systems can enhance hearing individuals' understanding of a signer's emotional intent. An online survey with 45 hearing participants (non-ASL signers) revealed frequent misinterpretations of signers' emotions when emotional and linguistic facial expressions were used simultaneously. The findings show that incorporating emotional voice into translation systems significantly improves emotion recognition by 32%. Additionally, follow-up survey with 48 DHH participants highlights design considerations for implementing emotional voice features, emphasizing the importance of emotional voice integration to bridge communication gaps between DHH and hearing communities.
Hyunchul Lim, Minghan Gao, Franklin Mingzhe Li, Nam Anh Dang, Ianip Sit, Michelle M. Olson, Cheng Zhang 0022
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.4