EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rich Galt
dblp:394/9188
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 50% Language models and text generation · 50% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompt tuning
prompt alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025 |
Human-AI interaction › AI agent
proactive agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under Uncertainty · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clarification questions · 1.7belief graph · 1.7VQAScore · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Proactive Agents for Multi-Turn Text-to-Image Generation Under UncertaintyabstractUser prompts for generative AI models are often underspecified, leading to a misalignment between the user intent and models’ understanding. As a result, users commonly have to painstakingly refine their prompts. We study this alignment problem in text-to-image (T2I) generation and propose a prototype for proactive T2I agents equipped with an interface to (1) actively ask clarification questions when uncertain, and (2) present their uncertainty about user intent as an understandable and editable belief graph. We build simple prototypes for such agents and propose a new scalable and automated evaluation approach using two agents, one with a ground truth intent (an image) while the other tries to ask as few questions as possible to align with the ground truth. We experiment over three image-text datasets: ImageInWords (Garg et al., 2024), COCO (Lin et al., 2014) and DesignBench, a benchmark we curated with strong artistic and design elements. Experiments over the three datasets demonstrate the proposed T2I agents’ ability to ask informative questions and elicit crucial information to achieve successful alignment with at least 2 times higher VQAScore (Lin et al., 2024) than the standard T2I generation. Moreover, we conducted human studies and observed that at least 90% of human subjects found these agents and their belief graphs helpful for their T2I workflow, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. Code and DesignBench can be found at https://github.com/google-deepmind/proactive_t2i_agents. Meera Hahn, Nithish Kannen, Rich Galt, Kartikeya Badola, Been Kim |
ICML | 4 |