Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guanglei Bao

dblp:395/0111 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-5174-1622ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 61% Machine learning and data management · 30% Data mining · 9%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
text-to-SQL
0.912025
Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Machine learning and data management
in-database machine learning
0.912025
Machine Learning Inference Pipeline Execution Using Pure SQL Based on Operator Fusion · ICDE 2025
Query processing and optimization › query compilation
operator fusion
0.912025
Machine Learning Inference Pipeline Execution Using Pure SQL Based on Operator Fusion · ICDE 2025
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting
0.912025
Machine Learning Inference Pipeline Execution Using Pure SQL Based on Operator Fusion · ICDE 2025
Visualization and visual analytics
data visualization
0.912025
Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization generation › automated visualization generation
natural language to visualization
0.912025
Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Data mining
exploratory data analysis
0.312025
Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.6hierarchical data context · 2.6greedy search · 0.9enumeration-based search · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Machine Learning Inference Pipeline Execution Using Pure SQL Based on Operator Fusion
abstract
Deploying machine learning (ML) inference pipelines in databases become increasingly prevalent in many applications. In order to avoid data transfer between the database and ML runtimes, existing ML2SQL frameworks parse ML pipelines to a graph consisting of ML operators and then translate it into pure SQL. Nevertheless, they typically rewrite the graph without operator fusion or only consider the fusion between certain operators such as StandardScaler and tree inference. However, there are various operators in ML pipelines, which have rich fusion opportunities between each other. To fully exploit operator fusion for graph rewriting, we classify widely used ML operators and design fusion rules driven by their characteristics. Moreover, rewriting the original graph by fusion rules produces candidate graphs that generate SQLs with different execution time. We employ an enumeration-based strategy to search for the graph with the lowest cost. However, this strategy may suffer from the combination explosion on search space for complex ML pipelines. To reduce this space, we propose a greedy-based strategy by exploiting the independence among ML operators. We implement a novel ML2SQL framework as a portable plugin for databases, namely Craftsman. Our experimental evaluations show that, in comparison to the existing approaches, Craftsman generates efficient SQL queries which achieves an average speedup of 2.9x on popular databases such as DuckDB.
Qingfeng Pan, Jiahe Zhi, Chen Xu 0001, Zhao Zhang 0009, Anita Shao, Guanglei Bao, Qiu Cui, Aoying Zhou
ICDE7
2025 Towards Automated Cross-domain Exploratory Data Analysis through Large Language Models
abstract
Exploratory data analysis (EDA), coupled with SQL, is essential for data analysts involved in data exploration and analysis. However, data analysts often encounter two primary challenges: (1) the need to craft SQL queries skillfully and (2) the requirement to generate suitable visualization types that enhance the interpretation of query results. Due to its significance, substantial research efforts have been made to explore different approaches to address these challenges, including leveraging large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods fail to meet real-world data exploration requirements primarily due to (1) complex database schema, (2) unclear user intent, (3) limited cross-domain generalization capability, and (4) insufficient end-to-end text-to-visualization capability. This paper presents TiInsight, an automated SQL-based cross-domain exploratory data analysis system. First, we propose a hierarchical data context (i.e., HDC), which leverages LLMs to summarize the contexts related to the database schema, which is crucial for open-world EDA systems to generalize across data domains. Second, the EDA system is divided into four components (i.e., stages): HDC generation, question clarification and decomposition, text-to-SQL generation (i.e., TiSQL), and data visualization (i.e., TiChart). Finally, we implemented an end-to-end EDA system with a user-friendly GUI in the production environment at PingCAP. We have also open-sourced all APIs of TiInsight to facilitate research within the EDA community. Through extensive evaluations by a real-world user study, we demonstrate that TiInsight offers remarkable performance compared to human experts. Additionally, TiSQL achieves an execution accuracy of 86.3% on the Spider dataset when using GPT-4. It also attains an execution accuracy of 60.98% on the Bird test dataset.
Jun-Peng Zhu, Boyan Niu, Peng Cai 0001, Zheming Ni, Jianwei Wan, Kai Xu 0003, Xuan Zhou 0001, Guanglei Bao
Proc. VLDB Endow.11