Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Youran Sun

dblp:395/2778 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 30% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Reinforcement learning · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.912025
rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.912025
rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model
0.912025
rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
graph-based retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › lightweight neural network
small language models
0.312025
rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-evolution · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9large language model · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9code-augmented chain-of-thought · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Existence, uniqueness, and physics-informed deep neural networks for physical systems governed by SDEs characterized by multi-fractional Gaussian noise
Tahereh Eftekhari, Youran Sun
Neurocomputing2
2025 rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking
abstract
We present rStar-Math to demonstrate that small language models (SLMs) can rival or even surpass the math reasoning capability of OpenAI o1, without distillation from superior models. rStar-Math achieves this by exercising “deep thinking” through Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), where a math policy SLM performs test-time search guided by an SLM-based process reward model. rStar-Math introduces three innovations to tackle the challenges in training the two SLMs: (1) a novel code-augmented CoT data synthesis method, which performs extensive MCTS rollouts to generate step-by-step verified reasoning trajectories used to train the policy SLM; (2) a novel process reward model training method that avoids naïve step-level score annotation, yielding a more effective process preference model (PPM); (3) a self-evolution recipe in which the policy SLM and PPM are built from scratch and iteratively evolved to improve reasoning capabilities. Through 4 rounds of self-evolution with millions of synthesized solutions for 747k math problems, rStar-Math boosts SLMs’ math reasoning to state-of-the-art levels. On MATH benchmark, it improves Qwen2.5-Math-7B from 58.8% to 90.0%, surpassing o1-preview by +4.5%. On the USA Math Olympiad (AIME), rStar-Math solves an average of 53.3% (8/15) of problems, ranking among the top 20% of the brightest high school math students. Code and data are available at https://github.com/microsoft/rStar.
Li Lyna Zhang, Youran Sun, Fan Yang 0024, Mao Yang 0004
ICML5
2025 In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework
Yingli Zhou, Yaodong Su, Youran Sun, Taotao Wang, Runyuan He, Sicong Liang, Xilin Liu 0001, Yuchi Ma, Yixiang Fang
Proc. VLDB Endow.3