Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youran Sun
dblp:395/2778
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 30% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Reinforcement learning · 30% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
graph-based retrieval-augmented generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › lightweight neural network
small language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinking · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-evolution · 0.9monte carlo tree search · 0.9large language model · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9code-augmented chain-of-thought · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Existence, uniqueness, and physics-informed deep neural networks for physical systems governed by SDEs characterized by multi-fractional Gaussian noise
Tahereh Eftekhari, Youran Sun |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2025 | rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep ThinkingabstractWe present rStar-Math to demonstrate that small language models (SLMs) can rival or even surpass the math reasoning capability of OpenAI o1, without distillation from superior models. rStar-Math achieves this by exercising “deep thinking” through Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), where a math policy SLM performs test-time search guided by an SLM-based process reward model. rStar-Math introduces three innovations to tackle the challenges in training the two SLMs: (1) a novel code-augmented CoT data synthesis method, which performs extensive MCTS rollouts to generate step-by-step verified reasoning trajectories used to train the policy SLM; (2) a novel process reward model training method that avoids naïve step-level score annotation, yielding a more effective process preference model (PPM); (3) a self-evolution recipe in which the policy SLM and PPM are built from scratch and iteratively evolved to improve reasoning capabilities. Through 4 rounds of self-evolution with millions of synthesized solutions for 747k math problems, rStar-Math boosts SLMs’ math reasoning to state-of-the-art levels. On MATH benchmark, it improves Qwen2.5-Math-7B from 58.8% to 90.0%, surpassing o1-preview by +4.5%. On the USA Math Olympiad (AIME), rStar-Math solves an average of 53.3% (8/15) of problems, ranking among the top 20% of the brightest high school math students. Code and data are available at https://github.com/microsoft/rStar. Li Lyna Zhang, Youran Sun, Fan Yang 0024, Mao Yang 0004 |
ICML | 5 |
| 2025 | In-depth Analysis of Graph-based RAG in a Unified Framework
Yingli Zhou, Yaodong Su, Youran Sun, Taotao Wang, Runyuan He, Sicong Liang, Xilin Liu 0001, Yuchi Ma, Yixiang Fang |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |