Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Klieger
dblp:395/4085
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code · NeurIPS 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research Code · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ResearchCodeBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Implementing Novel Machine Learning Research CodeabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have shown promise in transforming machine learning research, yet their capability to faithfully implement genuinely novel ideas from recent research papers—ideas unseen during pretraining—remains unclear. We introduce ResearchCodeBench, a benchmark that evaluates LLMs’ ability to translate cutting-edge ML contributions from top 2024-2025 research papers into executable code. We assessed 30+ proprietary and open-source LLMs, finding that even the best models correctly implement less than 40% of the code. We present empirical findings on performance comparison, contamination, and error patterns. By providing a rigorous evaluation platform, ResearchCodeBench enables continuous understanding and advancement of LLM-driven innovation in research code generation. Tianyu Hua, Harper Hua, Violet Xiang, Benjamin Klieger, Sang T. Truong, Weixin Liang, Fan-Yun Sun, Nick Haber |
NeurIPS | 4 |