Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hasara Kalumin

dblp:395/5593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
cost model
0.912025
Optimizing Queries with Many-to-Many Joins · ICDE 2025
Query processing and optimization › cost estimation
join cost estimation
0.912025
Optimizing Queries with Many-to-Many Joins · ICDE 2025
Query processing and optimization
join processing
0.912025
Optimizing Queries with Many-to-Many Joins · ICDE 2025
Query processing and optimization
query optimization
0.912025
Optimizing Queries with Many-to-Many Joins · ICDE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semijoin · 0.9predicate transfer · 0.9bitvector sideways information passing · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimizing Queries with Many-to-Many Joins
abstract
As database query processing techniques are being used to handle diverse workloads, a key emerging challenge is how to efficiently handle multi-way join queries containing multiple many-to-many joins. While uncommon in traditional enterprise settings, such queries are seen frequently in other contexts such as graph workloads. This has led to much work on developing join algorithms for handling cyclic queries, on compressed (factorized) representations for more efficient storage of intermediate results, and on use of semi-joins or predicate transfer to avoid generating large redundant intermediate results. In this paper, we address a core query optimization problem in this context. Specifically, we introduce an improved cost model that more accurately captures the cost of a query plan in such scenarios, and we present several optimization algorithms for query optimization that incorporate these new cost functions. We present an extensive experimental evaluation, that compares the factorized representation approach with a full semi-join reduction approach as well as to an approach that uses bitvectors to eliminate tuples early through sideways information passing. We also present new analyses of robustness of these techniques to the choice of the join order, potentially eliminating the need for more complex query optimization and selectivity estimation techniques.
Hasara Kalumin, Amol Deshpande
ICDE1