Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiazheng Kang
dblp:395/6258
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-2621-3011ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 36% Learning paradigms · 32% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › catastrophic forgetting
catastrophic forgetting mitigation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction tuning
continual instruction tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
mixture-of-experts adaptation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction Tuning · WWW 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug-target interaction prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Blend the Separated: Mixture of Synergistic Experts for Data-Scarcity Drug-Target Interaction Prediction · AAAI 2025 |
Operating systems › resource management
memory management |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Memory OS of AI Agent · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
agent memory |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Memory OS of AI Agent · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture of experts · 2.7semi-supervised learning · 1.7mutual supervision · 1.7generative adversarial network · 1.0adversarial training · 1.0LoRA · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Self-Evolving LLMs via Continual Instruction TuningabstractIn real-world industrial scenarios, large language models (LLMs) require Continuous Learning (CL) to adapt to diverse tasks as opera- tional requirements diversify, demanding self-evolution capabilities to autonomously refine their knowledge and adapt to dynamic envi- ronments. However, existing CL approaches, such as replay-based and parameter isolation techniques, struggle with the catastrophic forgetting problem: new task training degrades performance on prior tasks due to the model's adaptation to new data distributions, which weakens its generalization to old tasks. To address this issue, we propose a novel parameter-efficient adversarial MoE framework, MoE-CL, for industrial-scale self-evolving continual instruction tuning of LLMs. Specifically, MoE-CL employs a dual-expert archi- tecture to enable self-evolution: a dedicated LoRA expert for each task to preserve task-specific knowledge, ensuring parameter inde- pendence and mitigating forgetting, and a shared LoRA expert to facilitate cross-task knowledge transfer. Specifically, a task-aware discriminator within a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) is integrated into the shared expert to suppress task-irrelevant noise, ensuring only task-aligned knowledge is transferred during se- quential task training. Through adversarial training, the shared ex- pert learns generalized representations that mimic the task-aware discriminator, while dedicated experts retain task-specific details, balancing knowledge retention and cross-task generalization—key to the model's self-evolution by autonomously optimizing knowl- edge integration across tasks. Extensive experiments on a public MTL5 benchmark and an industrial Tencent3 benchmark validate MoE-CL's effectiveness in self-evolving continual learning. In real- world A/B testing on content compliance review in the Tencent Video Platform, MoE-CL reduced manual review costs by 15.3%,demonstrating its applicability for large-scale industrial deploy- ment where self-evolution is critical for adapting to evolving op- erational demands. Implementation code is publicly available at https://github.com/BAI-LAB/MoE-CL. Jiazheng Kang, Cheng Hou, Zhe Zhao 0006, Zhenxiang Yan, Ting Bai 0004 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2025 | Blend the Separated: Mixture of Synergistic Experts for Data-Scarcity Drug-Target Interaction PredictionabstractDrug-target interaction prediction (DTI) is essential in various applications including drug discovery and clinical application. There are two perspectives of input data widely used in DTI prediction: Intrinsic data represents how drugs or targets are constructed, and extrinsic data represents how drugs or targets are related to other biological entities. However, any of the two perspectives of input data can be scarce for some drugs or targets, especially for those unpopular or newly discovered. Furthermore, ground-truth labels for specific interaction types can also be scarce. Therefore, we propose the first method to tackle DTI prediction under input data and/or label scarcity. To make our model functional when only one perspective of input data is available, we design two separate experts to process intrinsic and extrinsic data respectively and fuse them adaptively according to different samples. Furthermore, to make the two perspectives complement each other and remedy label scarcity, two experts synergize with each other in a mutually supervised way to exploit the enormous unlabeled data. Extensive experiments on 3 real-world datasets under different extents of input data scarcity and/or label scarcity demonstrate our model outperforms states of the art significantly and steadily, with a maximum improvement of 53.53%. We also test our model without any data scarcity and it still outperforms current methods. Xinlong Zhai, Chunchen Wang, Jiazheng Kang, Shujie Li 0003, Zikai Zhou, Cheng Yang 0002, Chuan Shi 0001 |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | Memory OS of AI AgentabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) face a crucial challenge from fixed context windows and inadequate memory management, leading to a severe shortage of long-term memory capabilities and limited personalization in the interactive experience with AI agents.To overcome this challenge, we innovatively propose a Memory Operating System, i.e., Memo-ryOS, to achieve comprehensive and efficient memory management for AI agents.Inspired by the memory management principles in operating systems, MemoryOS designs a hierarchical storage architecture and consists of four key modules: Memory Storage, Updating, Retrieval, and Generation.Specifically, the architecture comprises three levels of storage units: short-term memory, mid-term memory, and long-term personal memory.Key operations within MemoryOS include dynamic updates between storage units: short-term to mid-term updates follow a dialogue-chain-based FIFO principle, while mid-term to long-term updates use a segmented page organization strategy.Extensive experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark show an average improvement of 49.11% on F1 and 46.18% on BLEU-1 over the baselines on GPT-4o-mini, showing contextual coherence and personalized memory retention in long conversations. Jiazheng Kang, Mingming Ji |
EMNLP | 1 |