Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fansong Yan
dblp:395/6410
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fusing Monotonic Decision Tree Based on Related Family · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fusing Monotonic Decision Tree Based on Related Family · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › interpretable classification
monotone classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fusing Monotonic Decision Tree Based on Related Family · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Fusing Monotonic Decision Tree Based on Related Family · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
related family · 0.9rank mutual information · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fusing Monotonic Decision Tree Based on Related FamilyabstractMonotonic classification is a special ordinal classification task that involves monotonicity constraints between features and the decision. Monotonic feature selection can reduce dimensionality while preserving the monotonicity constraints, ultimately improving the efficiency and performance of monotonic classifiers. However, existing feature selection algorithms cannot handle large-scale monotonic data sets due to their lack of consideration for monotonic constraints or their high computational complexities. To address these issues, building on our team's previous research, we define the monotonic related family method with lower time complexity to select informative features and obtain multi-reducts carrying complementary information from multi-view for raw feature space. Using bi-directional rank mutual information, we build two trees for each feature subset and fuse all trees using the corresponding decision support level (BFMDT). Compared with six representative algorithms for monotonic feature selection, BFMDT's average classification accuracy increased by 4.06% (FFREMT), 6.77% (FCMT), 5.61% (FPRS_up), 6.05% (FPRS_down), 5.86%(FPRS_global), 4.41% (Bagging), 7.65% (REMT) and 21.89% (FMKNN), the average execution time compared to tree-based algorithms decreased by 83.41% (FFREMT), 96.96% (FCMT), 75.64% (FPRS_up), 59.43% (FPRS_down), 84.65%(FPRS_global), 81.50% (Bagging) and 63.41% (REMT), while most of comparing algorithms were unable to complete computation on six high-dimensional datasets. Fansong Yan, Fengcai Qiao, Jieting Wang |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |