Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eleanor Trollope

dblp:395/7832 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty
0.912025
Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
decision theory
0.912025
Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information theory · 0.9decision theory · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty
abstract
The ideas of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty are widely used to reason about the probabilistic predictions of machine-learning models. We identify incoherence in existing discussions of these ideas and suggest this stems from the aleatoric-epistemic view being insufficiently expressive to capture all the distinct quantities that researchers are interested in. To address this we present a decision-theoretic perspective that relates rigorous notions of uncertainty, predictive performance and statistical dispersion in data. This serves to support clearer thinking as the field moves forward. Additionally we provide insights into popular information-theoretic quantities, showing they can be poor estimators of what they are often purported to measure, while also explaining how they can still be useful in guiding data acquisition.
Freddie Bickford Smith, Jannik Kossen, Eleanor Trollope, Mark van der Wilk, Adam Foster 0001, Tom Rainforth
ICML3