Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Radu Florin Tulcan

dblp:396/1614 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6966-1136ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Multi-agent systems · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Logic in computer science · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
automotive systems
1.012026
Hybrid Spatiotemporal Logic for Automotive Applications: Modeling and Model-Checking · FM (1) 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
1.012026
Hybrid Spatiotemporal Logic for Automotive Applications: Modeling and Model-Checking · FM (1) 2026
Logic in computer science › modal logic
temporal and spatial logic
1.012026
Hybrid Spatiotemporal Logic for Automotive Applications: Modeling and Model-Checking · FM (1) 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning
0.912025
Combining MORL with Restraining Bolts to Learn Normative Behaviour · IJCAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
normative reasoning
0.912025
Combining MORL with Restraining Bolts to Learn Normative Behaviour · IJCAI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › normative multi-agent systems › social norms
norm compliance
0.912025
Combining MORL with Restraining Bolts to Learn Normative Behaviour · IJCAI 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.912025
Combining MORL with Restraining Bolts to Learn Normative Behaviour · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

restraining bolts · 0.9multi-objective reinforcement learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Hybrid Spatiotemporal Logic for Automotive Applications: Modeling and Model-Checking
abstract
Abstract We introduce a hybrid spatiotemporal logic for automotive safety applications (HSTL), focused on highway driving. Spatiotemporal logic features specifications about vehicles throughout space and time, while hybrid logic enables precise references to individual vehicles and their historical positions. We define the semantics of HSTL and provide a baseline model-checking algorithm for it. We propose two optimized model-checking algorithms, which reduce the search space based on the reachable states and possible transitions from one state to another. All three model-checking algorithms are evaluated on a series of common driving scenarios such as safe following, safe crossings, overtaking, and platooning. An exponential performance improvement is observed for the optimized algorithms.
Radu Florin Tulcan, Rose Bohrer, Yoàv Montacute, Kevin Zhou, Yusuke Kawamoto 0001, Ichiro Hasuo
FM (1)1
2025 Combining MORL with Restraining Bolts to Learn Normative Behaviour
abstract
Normative Restraining Bolts (NRBs) adapt the restraining bolt technique (originally developed for safe reinforcement learning) to ensure compliance with social, legal, and ethical norms. While effective, NRBs rely on trial-and-error weight tuning, which hinders their ability to enforce hierarchical norms; moreover, norm updates require retraining. In this paper, we reformulate learning with NRBs as a multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) problem, where each norm is treated as a distinct objective. This enables the introduction of Ordered Normative Restraining Bolts (ONRBs), which support algorithmic weight selection, prioritized norms, norm updates, and provide formal guarantees on minimizing norm violations. Case studies show that ONRBs offer a robust and principled foundation for RL-agents to comply with a wide range of norms while achieving their goals.
Emery A. Neufeld, Agata Ciabattoni, Radu Florin Tulcan
IJCAI3
2024 Norm Compliance in Reinforcement Learning Agents via Restraining Bolts
abstract
We modify the restraining bolt technique, originally designed for safe reinforcement learning, to regulate agent behavior in alignment with social, ethical, and legal norms. Rather than maximizing rewards for norm compliance, our approach minimizes penalties for norm violations. We demonstrate in case studies the effectiveness of our approach in capturing benchmark challenges in normative reasoning like contrary-to-duty obligations, exceptions, and temporal obligations.
Emery A. Neufeld, Agata Ciabattoni, Radu Florin Tulcan
JURIX3