EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Swain
dblp:396/5487
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › markov games
mixed-motive games |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Melting Pot Contest: Charting the Future of Generalized Cooperative Intelligence · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Melting Pot Contest: Charting the Future of Generalized Cooperative Intelligence · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-agent reinforcement learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Melting Pot Contest: Charting the Future of Generalized Cooperative IntelligenceabstractMulti-agent AI research promises a path to develop human-like and human-compatible intelligent technologies that complement the solipsistic view of other approaches, which mostly do not consider interactions between agents. Aiming to make progress in this direction, the Melting Pot contest 2023 focused on the problem of cooperation among interacting agents and challenged researchers to push the boundaries of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for mixed-motive games. The contest leveraged the Melting Pot environment suite to rigorously evaluate how well agents can adapt their cooperative skills to interact with novel partners in unforeseen situations. Unlike other reinforcement learning challenges, this challenge focused on social rather than environmental generalization. In particular, a population of agents performs well in Melting Pot when its component individuals are adept at finding ways to cooperate both with others in their population and with strangers. Thus Melting Pot measures cooperative intelligence.The contest attracted over 600 participants across 100+ teams globally and was a success on multiple fronts: (i) it contributed to our goal of pushing the frontiers of MARL towards building more cooperatively intelligent agents, evidenced by several submissions that outperformed established baselines; (ii) it attracted a diverse range of participants, from independent researchers to industry affiliates and academic labs, both with strong background and new interest in the area alike, broadening the field’s demographic and intellectual diversity; and (iii) analyzing the submitted agents provided important insights, highlighting areas for improvement in evaluating agents' cooperative intelligence. This paper summarizes the design aspects and results of the contest and explores the potential of Melting Pot as a benchmark for studying Cooperative AI. We further analyze the top solutions and conclude with a discussion on promising directions for future research. Rakshit S. Trivedi, Akbir Khan, Jesse Clifton, Lewis Hammond, Edgar A. Duéñez-Guzmán, Dipam Chakraborty, John P. Agapiou, Jayd Matyas, Alexander Vezhnevets, Barna Pásztor, Yunke Ao, Omar G. Younis, Benjamin Swain, Haoyuan Qin, Mian Deng, Ziwei Deng, Utku Erdoganaras, Yue Zhao 0023, Marko Tesic, Natasha Jaques, Jakob N. Foerster, Vincent Conitzer, José Hernández-Orallo, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Joel Z. Leibo |
NeurIPS | 14 |