Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kefan Tang

dblp:396/5570 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-3153-6313ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 32%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
temporal sentence grounding
1.722025
Dual Semantic Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Temporal Sentence Grounding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025
Boosting Temporal Sentence Grounding via Causal Inference · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Boosting Temporal Sentence Grounding via Causal Inference · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious correlation mitigation
0.912025
Boosting Temporal Sentence Grounding via Causal Inference · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
video-language grounding
0.912025
Dual Semantic Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Temporal Sentence Grounding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › temporal sentence grounding
weakly supervised temporal grounding
0.912025
Dual Semantic Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Temporal Sentence Grounding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › moment retrieval
video moment retrieval
0.312025
Dual Semantic Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Temporal Sentence Grounding · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural causal model · 0.9masked reconstruction · 0.9feature disentanglement · 0.9do-calculus · 0.9counterfactual reasoning · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9causal inference · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Boosting Temporal Sentence Grounding via Causal Inference
abstract
Temporal Sentence Grounding (TSG) aims to identify relevant moments in an untrimmed video that semantically correspond to a given textual query. Despite existing studies having made substantial progress, they often overlook the issue of spurious correlations between video and textual queries. These spurious correlations arise from two primary factors: (1) inherent biases in the textual data, such as frequent co-occurrences of specific verbs or phrases, and (2) the model's tendency to overfit to salient or repetitive patterns in video content. Such biases mislead the model into associating textual cues with incorrect visual moments, resulting in unreliable predictions and poor generalization to out-of-distribution examples. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel TSG framework, causal intervention and counterfactual reasoning that utilizes causal inference to eliminate spurious correlations and enhance the model's robustness. Specifically, we first formulate the TSG task from a causal perspective with a structural causal model. Then, to address unobserved confounders reflecting textual biases toward specific verbs or phrases, a textual causal intervention is proposed, utilizing do-calculus to estimate the causal effects. Furthermore, visual counterfactual reasoning is performed by constructing a counterfactual scenario that focuses solely on video features, excluding the query and fused multi-modal features. This allows us to debias the model by isolating and removing the influence of the video from the overall effect. Experiments on public datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method. The code is available at https://github.com/Tangkfan/CICR.
Kefan Tang, Lihuo He, Jisheng Dang, Xinbo Gao 0001
ACM Multimedia1
2025 Dual Semantic Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Temporal Sentence Grounding
abstract
Weakly supervised temporal sentence grounding aims to identify semantically relevant video moments in an untrimmed video corresponding to a given sentence query without exact timestamps. Neuropsychology research indicates that the way the human brain handles information varies based on the grammatical categories of words, highlighting the importance of separately considering nouns and verbs. However, current methodologies primarily utilize pre-extracted video features to reconstruct randomly masked queries, neglecting the distinction between grammatical classes. This oversight could hinder forming meaningful connections between linguistic elements and the corresponding components in the video. To address this limitation, this paper introduces the dual semantic reconstruction network (DSRN) model. DSRN processes video features by distinctly correlating object features with nouns and motion features with verbs, thereby mimicking the human brain's parsing mechanism. It begins with a feature disentanglement module that separately extracts object-aware and motion-aware features from video content. Then, in a dual-branch structure, these disentangled features are used to generate separate proposals for objects and motions through two dedicated proposal generation modules. A consistency constraint is proposed to ensure a high level of agreement between the boundaries of object-related and motion-related proposals. Subsequently, the DSRN independently reconstructs masked nouns and verbs from the sentence queries using the generated proposals. Finally, an integration block is applied to synthesize the two types of proposals, distinguishing between positive and negative instances through contrastive learning. Experiments on the Charades-STA and ActivityNet Captions datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Kefan Tang, Lihuo He, Nannan Wang 0001, Xinbo Gao 0001
IEEE Trans. Multim.1