Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kuat Gazizov
dblp:396/6256
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 29% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational complexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A faster training algorithm for regression trees with linear leaves, and an analysis of its complexity · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
alternating minimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A faster training algorithm for regression trees with linear leaves, and an analysis of its complexity · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The tree autoencoder model, with application to hierarchical data visualization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The tree autoencoder model, with application to hierarchical data visualization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Visualization and visual analytics
hierarchical data visualization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The tree autoencoder model, with application to hierarchical data visualization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The tree autoencoder model, with application to hierarchical data visualization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree alternating optimization · 1.7sherman-morrison-woodbury formula · 1.7joint optimization · 1.5local PCA · 0.8LocalPCA · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A faster training algorithm for regression trees with linear leaves, and an analysis of its complexityabstractWe consider the Tree Alternating Optimization (TAO) algorithm to train regression trees with linear predictors in the leaves. Unlike the traditional, greedy recursive partitioning algorithms such as CART, TAO guarantees a monotonic decrease of the objective function and results in smaller trees of much better accuracy. We modify the TAO algorithm so that it produces exactly the same result but is much faster, particularly for high input dimensionality or deep trees. The idea is based on the fact that, at each iteration of TAO, each leaf receives only a subset of the training instances. Thus, the optimization of the leaf model can be done exactly but faster by using the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula. This has the unexpected advantage that, once a tree exceeds a critical depth, then making it deeper makes it faster to train, even though the tree is larger and has more parameters. Indeed, this can make learning a nonlinear model (the tree) asymptotically faster than a regular linear regression model. We analyze the corresponding computational complexity and verify the speedups experimentally in various datasets. The argument can be applied to other types of trees, whenever the optimization of a node can be computed in superlinear time of the number of instances. Kuat Gazizov, Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpiñán |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | The tree autoencoder model, with application to hierarchical data visualizationabstractWe propose a new model for dimensionality reduction, the PCA tree, which works like a regular autoencoder, having explicit projection and reconstruction mappings. The projection is effected by a sparse oblique tree, having hard, hyperplane splits using few features and linear leaves. The reconstruction mapping is a set of local linear mappings. Thus, rather than producing a global map as in t-SNE and other methods, which often leads to distortions, it produces a hierarchical set of local PCAs. The use of a sparse oblique tree and PCA makes the overall model interpretable and very fast to project or reconstruct new points. Joint optimization of all the parameters in the tree is a nonconvex nondifferentiable problem. We propose an algorithm that is guaranteed to decrease the error monotonically and which scales to large datasets without any approximation. In experiments, we show PCA trees are able to identify a wealth of low-dimensional and cluster structure in image and document datasets. Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpiñán, Kuat Gazizov |
NeurIPS | 2 |