Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengao Li

dblp:397/3628 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 65% Reinforcement learning · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
multi-objective alignment
0.912025
Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.912025
Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.912025
Controlling Large Language Models Through Concept Activation Vectors · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › concept-based explanation
concept activation vector
0.312025
Controlling Large Language Models Through Concept Activation Vectors · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312025
Controlling Large Language Models Through Concept Activation Vectors · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.9pareto optimization · 0.9multi-gradient descent · 0.9concept activation vectors · 0.9activation steering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Controlling Large Language Models Through Concept Activation Vectors
abstract
As large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed across various domains, the ability to control their generated outputs has become more critical. This control involves aligning LLMs outputs with human values and ethical principles or customizing LLMs on specific topics or styles for individual users. Existing controlled generation methods either require significant computational resources and extensive trial-and-error or provide coarse-grained control. In this paper, we propose Generation with Concept Activation Vector (GCAV), a lightweight model control framework that ensures accurate control without requiring resource-extensive fine-tuning. Specifically, GCAV first trains a concept activation vector for specified concepts to be controlled, such as toxicity. During inference, GCAV steers the concept vector in LLMs, for example, by removing the toxicity concept vector from the activation layers. Control experiments from different perspectives, including toxicity reduction, sentiment control, linguistic style, and topic control, demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance with granular control, allowing for fine-grained adjustments of both the steering layers and the steering magnitudes for individual samples.
Xiting Wang, Chengao Li, Xiang Ao 0001, Qing He 0003
AAAI3
2025 Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models
abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful technique for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.However, effectively aligning LLMs with diverse human preferences remains a significant challenge, particularly when they are conflict.To address this issue, we frame human value alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem, aiming to maximize a set of potentially conflicting objectives.We introduce Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization (GAPO), a novel fine-tuning paradigm that employs multiple-gradient descent to align LLMs with diverse preference distributions.GAPO adaptively rescales the gradients for each objective to determine an update direction that optimally balances the tradeoffs between objectives.Additionally, we introduce P-GAPO, which incorporates user preferences across different objectives and achieves Pareto solutions that better align with the user's specific needs.Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that GAPO converges towards a Pareto optimal solution for multiple objectives.Empirical results on Mistral-7B show that GAPO outperforms current state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior performance in both helpfulness and harmlessness.
Chengao Li, Yunkun Xu, Hongyan Xue, Xiang Ao 0001, Qing He 0003
ACL (1)1